New servers and new inline cache
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 12982
interpreted = N
texte = I see at macworld boston the Apple released a bunch of new workgroupsservers that come with 1 meg of inline cache. Since I use webcatalog tocache all docs I assume I will see a dramtic speed increase over my old7100/80 forgetting pure processor speed. What I am really asking if I wasto replace a server I would be smart to look at lineline or backside cacheand that this would speed up webcatalog cached served docs? Anybody havecomments on what I might expect?Speaking of cache...I have a dumb question. When I display a very largewebcatalog database over a 28.8 dial up account it pours out in excess of3.0K per sec. The template when filled aproaches about 90K. Howeverimages using webstar cache come in always in around the 1.4 K per secrange. Why is this? Is there something about the webcatalog cache systemthat is better then the webstar cache system? Or is there a webstarsetting that somebody thinks I should look at.I will not be able to respond to comments until next monday. Off to thePGA championship at Wing Foot and watch a pure golf course eat Tiger Woodslunch:)===============================================Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com===============================================
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I see at macworld boston the Apple released a bunch of new workgroupsservers that come with 1 meg of inline cache. Since I use webcatalog tocache all docs I assume I will see a dramtic speed increase over my old7100/80 forgetting pure processor speed. What I am really asking if I wasto replace a server I would be smart to look at lineline or backside cacheand that this would speed up webcatalog cached served docs? Anybody havecomments on what I might expect?Speaking of cache...I have a dumb question. When I display a very largewebcatalog database over a 28.8 dial up account it pours out in excess of3.0K per sec. The template when filled aproaches about 90K. Howeverimages using webstar cache come in always in around the 1.4 K per secrange. Why is this? Is there something about the webcatalog cache systemthat is better then the webstar cache system? Or is there a webstarsetting that somebody thinks I should look at.I will not be able to respond to comments until next monday. Off to thePGA championship at Wing Foot and watch a pure golf course eat Tiger Woodslunch:)===============================================Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com===============================================
grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter)
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
Not really WebCat (1997)
Another Flash Question (2000)
WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems (1997)
WebDNA problems with Itools 7.3 Upgrade (2004)
Passing Username and Password on the command line (2000)
Sendmail question (2002)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Need help with emailer- 2 issues (1997)
Store Example to Use (1998)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
docs for WebCatalog2 (1997)
Emailing html (1998)
WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997)
[WebDNA] [OT] BBEdit Glossary (2012)
alternate location for cookies (2001)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
RE: Sorting error (1997)
[OT] two domains one site... (2005)