Re: WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 - PIXO
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 14470
interpreted = N
texte = >Is the PIXO support in this release enough faster for me to justify >implementing a way to use plug-ins in both W* and W*/SSL? > >I had conceived of a way to do this for a particular site, but earlier >Grant had said there would be no speed improvement over the acgi.First off, it's beta, so be careful of unknown bugs in PIXO support. That said, it sounds like you've figured out a way to somehow have 1 plugin used by both W* and W*SSL. If so, I'd really like to know how to do this.PIXO in itself does not really speed anything up; it just makes it possible to 'hand off' HTML from one plugin to another. I have verified that you can use WebDNA to 'write' NetCloak tags, and both are processed correctly by their respective plugins.I haven't done any true benchmarking, but I know that the memory allocation routines in W*1.3.1 are not as efficient as they could be. It's worth trying your technique on later versions of W* to see what happens.Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | ==== eCommerce for the Rest of Us ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Is the PIXO support in this release enough faster for me to justify >implementing a way to use plug-ins in both W* and W*/SSL? > >I had conceived of a way to do this for a particular site, but earlier >Grant had said there would be no speed improvement over the acgi.First off, it's beta, so be careful of unknown bugs in PIXO support. That said, it sounds like you've figured out a way to somehow have 1 plugin used by both W* and W*SSL. If so, I'd really like to know how to do this.PIXO in itself does not really speed anything up; it just makes it possible to 'hand off' HTML from one plugin to another. I have verified that you can use WebDNA to 'write' NetCloak tags, and both are processed correctly by their respective plugins.I haven't done any true benchmarking, but I know that the memory allocation routines in W*1.3.1 are not as efficient as they could be. It's worth trying your technique on later versions of W* to see what happens.Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | ==== eCommerce for the Rest of Us ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/
Grant Hulbert
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Timeout question .. (2003)
Server problem? (1998)
PCS search results page (1998)
[ShowNext] (2007)
[WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (2009)
Nested tags count question (1997)
Enhanced Master Counter? (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Grouping Fields in Context (1999)
Unexpected error (1997)
Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997)
Uh...can someone help me out with the b10? (1997)
Help name our technology! I found it (1997)
downloadable txt file (2001)
DreamWeaver Extensions (2000)
Multiple 'Users.db' files not possible (1997)
creator code (1997)
'page impression' techniques for banner ads (1999)
WebCat and AppleShare 6.0 (1998)
Database Updates (1997)