Re: New index for docs

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 14659
interpreted = N
texte = >Because WebCatalog has so many features, I'm trying to create a better way >to organize them in the docs. Alphabetical is OK if you already know what >you're looking for, but I think we can categorize the features better. >Please look at this new index and give me feedback-- > >http://test.smithmicro.com/webcatalog/webcatreference/MajorGroups.html >Grant,Please also consider putting the docs entirely into HTML format so that they can be indexed with something like Maxum's Phantom. For instance, there are many simple things that may never rate an entry in an alphabetical index, yet to the user it may not be clear what group or category they may be in. Being able to do a find on something like rq or data would be very helpful.Who knows... there may even be a simple way to do this with WebCat?Thanks, Paul _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ _/_/_/Paul Uttermohlen, Internet Marketspace, Inc. \_\_\_\_ _/_/_/ mailto:paul@ims1.com - Website Development \_\_\_\_ _/_/_/ Business - _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ _/_/_/ Real Estate - _\_\_\_\_ _/_/_/Websites - Children _/ _\_\_\_ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ | \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: New index for docs (Luke Melia 1997)
  2. Re: New index for docs (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  3. Re: New index for docs (Paul Uttermohlen 1997)
  4. Re: New index for docs (Gil Poulsen 1997)
  5. New index for docs (Grant Hulbert 1997)
>Because WebCatalog has so many features, I'm trying to create a better way >to organize them in the docs. Alphabetical is OK if you already know what >you're looking for, but I think we can categorize the features better. >Please look at this new index and give me feedback-- > >http://test.smithmicro.com/webcatalog/webcatreference/MajorGroups.html >Grant,Please also consider putting the docs entirely into HTML format so that they can be indexed with something like Maxum's Phantom. For instance, there are many simple things that may never rate an entry in an alphabetical index, yet to the user it may not be clear what group or category they may be in. Being able to do a find on something like rq or data would be very helpful.Who knows... there may even be a simple way to do this with WebCat?Thanks, Paul _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ _/_/_/Paul Uttermohlen, Internet Marketspace, Inc. \_\_\_\_ _/_/_/ mailto:paul@ims1.com - Website Development \_\_\_\_ _/_/_/ Business - _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ _/_/_/ Real Estate - _\_\_\_\_ _/_/_/Websites - Children _/ _\_\_\_ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ | \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Paul Uttermohlen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) Smart caching problems with 2.1b3? (1997) international time (1997) Introduction/Tutorial/QuickStart (1997) Banners (1997) Great product and great job ! (1997) Showing formatted results in tables (2002) About WebDNA (2006) Display [price] in banner ad (1998) Suffix or Line? (1999) Develop on Mac - Serve on Linux (2002) Product Comparison (2000) Stinkin' [Referrer] (1998) [include] and not found (2005) Is it possible to pause or wait a process (2000) a new bug? (1999) if else problem (2003) Plugin or CGI or both (1997) billing system (2003) Caching [include] files ... (1997)