Re: Odd error in logs
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 17905
interpreted = N
texte = >Other than the obvious, is there any condition that would cause the error: > >Error: the database '' could not be found or opened > >to appear in the logs? It's coming from a search page that gets its >criteria passed to it from another page in a frame. The first time the >page gets called, it's ok, but hitting the show next X matches buttons >(which cause the same page to get loaded with new search criteria) cause >the above error to get written to the log. I've looked through the coding >and I'm not referencing any unnamed databases, so I'm wondering (before I >send a 35K page off to support to decipher) what else, if anything, could >cause this.Interesting situation. Are there any [include] files being referenced on the page that don't have a database reference in them where they should have? Sometimes the searches written into [include] files get overlooked ... >Oh yes, the searching works fine. Maybe I should be letting sleeping dogs >lie and just remember to ditch the ErrorLog.txt file every couple daysOr if you really don't need that ErrorLog.txt file you can actually just trash it without any negative effects on WebCatalog. I don't even have one in my hierarchy and I never miss it. I wouldn't suggest this for everyone, but it works for me ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Other than the obvious, is there any condition that would cause the error: > >Error: the database '' could not be found or opened > >to appear in the logs? It's coming from a search page that gets its >criteria passed to it from another page in a frame. The first time the >page gets called, it's ok, but hitting the show next X matches buttons >(which cause the same page to get loaded with new search criteria) cause >the above error to get written to the log. I've looked through the coding >and I'm not referencing any unnamed databases, so I'm wondering (before I >send a 35K page off to support to decipher) what else, if anything, could >cause this.Interesting situation. Are there any
[include] files being referenced on the page that don't have a database reference in them where they should have? Sometimes the searches written into
[include] files get overlooked ... >Oh yes, the searching works fine. Maybe I should be letting sleeping dogs >lie and just remember to ditch the ErrorLog.txt file every couple daysOr if you really don't need that ErrorLog.txt file you can actually just trash it without any negative effects on WebCatalog. I don't even have one in my hierarchy and I never miss it. I wouldn't suggest this for everyone, but it works for me ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Null Chars (1999)
mail test (1997)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
Show if time tags (1997)
filemaker - orderfile (1997)
Backwards list behavior ... (1997)
RE: Help name our technology! (1997)
[LOOKUP] (1997)
Search with Special Chars (1997)
about this server and links to who (1997)
[append] problem (1997)
RE: Emailer prefs in two places ... (1997)
FORMS: Returning a specific page (1997)
SQL statements (2002)
[quantity] - spoke too soon (1997)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
More Applescript (1997)
Help with getting rpm file (2002)
Summing a field full of numbers ... (1997)