Re: _ in front of field name

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18910
interpreted = N
texte = The primary reason the database helper adds an underscore to the field name in a form is so it can use the [formvariables] context to quickly loop through all the incoming variables (by setting name=_&exact=f as parameters to the context). By using [getchars] to get rid of the leading _, it can easily append or replace the fields as well. The actual name of the fields do not have the underscore in front.John. >This certainly makes sense. But I would swear the database helper did it >for creative database names too. > >Is there documentation on this _ thing? Is there a list of reserved words? > > > >>At 13:31 Uhr 15.07.1998, Sue Ann Sanders wrote: >>>What is the significance of a _ in front of the field names within a >>>form? I believe this was done automatically when I used the database >>>helper.? >> >>It is a good idea to have a naming convention to avoid equal names for >>fields and WebCat commands. Imagine you name a field of your form date >>for the birthday. If you ask for this field on the following page, you >>write for example: >>Since you are born on [date] you are too old... >>In this case WebCat will NOT insert the form field but todays date because >>[date] is a command! >> >>So, if you name all form fields and variables according to such a naming >>convention, you will never make a similar mistake. That is why you see >>often names like [_date], [v.email] or similar in the code of other people. >> >>Peter >> >>__________________________________________ >>Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.com >>Ostry & Partner - Ostry Internet Solutions >>Auhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austria >>fon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21 >> John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast Software eCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: _ in front of field name (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  2. Re: _ in front of field name (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  3. Re: _ in front of field name (Peter Ostry 1998)
  4. Re: _ in front of field name (Brian B. Burton 1998)
  5. Re: _ in front of field name (John Hill 1998)
  6. Re: _ in front of field name (Sue Ann Sanders 1998)
  7. Re: _ in front of field name (Peter Ostry 1998)
  8. _ in front of field name (Sue Ann Sanders 1998)
The primary reason the database helper adds an underscore to the field name in a form is so it can use the [formvariables] context to quickly loop through all the incoming variables (by setting name=_&exact=f as parameters to the context). By using [getchars] to get rid of the leading _, it can easily append or replace the fields as well. The actual name of the fields do not have the underscore in front.John. >This certainly makes sense. But I would swear the database helper did it >for creative database names too. > >Is there documentation on this _ thing? Is there a list of reserved words? > > > >>At 13:31 Uhr 15.07.1998, Sue Ann Sanders wrote: >>>What is the significance of a _ in front of the field names within a >>>form? I believe this was done automatically when I used the database >>>helper.? >> >>It is a good idea to have a naming convention to avoid equal names for >>fields and WebCat commands. Imagine you name a field of your form date >>for the birthday. If you ask for this field on the following page, you >>write for example: >>Since you are born on [date] you are too old... >>In this case WebCat will NOT insert the form field but todays date because >>[date] is a command! >> >>So, if you name all form fields and variables according to such a naming >>convention, you will never make a similar mistake. That is why you see >>often names like [_date], [v.email] or similar in the code of other people. >> >>Peter >> >>__________________________________________ >>Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.com >>Ostry & Partner - Ostry Internet Solutions >>Auhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austria >>fon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21 >> John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast Software eCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com John Hill

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

PCS Frames (1997) Credit card types (1997) No Access warning when caching HTML files (1997) WebCat Documentation (was [platform] tag?) (1998) pass a captured value (2004) OT: 800x600 (2003) Multiple prices (1997) Webcatalog error, Plug-in for Webstar (1996) Questions To Answer (1997) bug in [SendMail] (1997) WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997) WebCatalog stalls (1998) Possible Hijacking from Globix (2002) Move WebDNA DB to MySQL (2005) Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997) problem: type 2 errors (1997) wired [protect] action? (1998) PCS Frames (1997) Caching [include] files ... (1997) [WebDNA] Two file tags don't work as expected (2009)