Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18921
interpreted = N
texte = At 17:37 Uhr 15.07.1998, de Saint Phalle, Andre wrote:>I am using WebSTAR 3.0.... Should I sidegrade to WebTEN?WebTen is faster and has more features - it is all true they say about it.But you should be aware that with WebTen you actually run the Apache serverunder Unix right on your Mac. Compared to WebStar you enter the nextlevel of webserving, means you have to learn a lot and loose some of theeasy administration real Mac-based programs are famous for. But it isworth to do the step if you are willing to learn some Unix to understandthe system - not right from the start, but during the following months.We switched from WebStar 2.1 to WebTen a couple of months ago, had someserious troubles sometimes, because we did not understand important basicthings at the beginning. Then we learned to handle the new thing morecarefully and now we are very very happy with it. Support is great.BTW - our next webserver will be Apache on a linux box, we want to reducethe load on the Mac and run only those sites there, which need the Mac(databases with WebCat for example...)Peter__________________________________________Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.comOstry & Partner - Ostry Internet SolutionsAuhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austriafon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 17:37 Uhr 15.07.1998, de Saint Phalle, Andre wrote:>I am using WebSTAR 3.0.... Should I sidegrade to WebTEN?WebTen is faster and has more features - it is all true they say about it.But you should be aware that with WebTen you actually run the Apache serverunder Unix right on your Mac. Compared to WebStar you enter the nextlevel of webserving, means you have to learn a lot and loose some of theeasy administration real Mac-based programs are famous for. But it isworth to do the step if you are willing to learn some Unix to understandthe system - not right from the start, but during the following months.We switched from WebStar 2.1 to WebTen a couple of months ago, had someserious troubles sometimes, because we did not understand important basicthings at the beginning. Then we learned to handle the new thing morecarefully and now we are very very happy with it. Support is great.BTW - our next webserver will be Apache on a linux box, we want to reducethe load on the Mac and run only those sites there, which need the Mac(databases with WebCat for example...)Peter__________________________________________Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.comOstry & Partner - Ostry Internet SolutionsAuhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austriafon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[WebDNA] Data loss (2016)
Configuring E-mail (1997)
Mac 4.0b2 Installer Problems (2000)
Extended [ConvertChars] (1997)
popups, netscape vs explorer (1997)
[WebDNA] WebDNA and simple password systems (2009)
DNS Lookup 2 (2000)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
Me know logical no need (2002)
[WebDNA] Test (2009)
WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)
Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (2003)
WebCat & WebTen (1997)
Decimal point in search.... (2004)
.. more on sliding discounts... (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
too many nested ... problem (1997)
Trigger Happy (2005)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
CMS - Formatting Content (2004)