Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18921
interpreted = N
texte = At 17:37 Uhr 15.07.1998, de Saint Phalle, Andre wrote: >I am using WebSTAR 3.0.... Should I sidegrade to WebTEN?WebTen is faster and has more features - it is all true they say about it. But you should be aware that with WebTen you actually run the Apache server under Unix right on your Mac. Compared to WebStar you enter the next level of webserving, means you have to learn a lot and loose some of the easy administration real Mac-based programs are famous for. But it is worth to do the step if you are willing to learn some Unix to understand the system - not right from the start, but during the following months.We switched from WebStar 2.1 to WebTen a couple of months ago, had some serious troubles sometimes, because we did not understand important basic things at the beginning. Then we learned to handle the new thing more carefully and now we are very very happy with it. Support is great. BTW - our next webserver will be Apache on a linux box, we want to reduce the load on the Mac and run only those sites there, which need the Mac (databases with WebCat for example...) Peter__________________________________________ Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.com Ostry & Partner - Ostry Internet Solutions Auhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austria fon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebTEN vs webSTARtopic (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  2. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Brian B. Burton 1998)
  3. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  4. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  5. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Brian B. Burton 1998)
  6. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Peter Ostry 1998)
  7. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Eric Zelenka 1998)
  8. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR have you seen this? (Gary Richter 1998)
  9. Re: WebTEN vs webSTARtopic (Gary Richter 1998)
  10. WebTEN vs webSTAR (andre@adsp.com (de Saint Phalle, Andre) 1998)
At 17:37 Uhr 15.07.1998, de Saint Phalle, Andre wrote: >I am using WebSTAR 3.0.... Should I sidegrade to WebTEN?WebTen is faster and has more features - it is all true they say about it. But you should be aware that with WebTen you actually run the Apache server under Unix right on your Mac. Compared to WebStar you enter the next level of webserving, means you have to learn a lot and loose some of the easy administration real Mac-based programs are famous for. But it is worth to do the step if you are willing to learn some Unix to understand the system - not right from the start, but during the following months.We switched from WebStar 2.1 to WebTen a couple of months ago, had some serious troubles sometimes, because we did not understand important basic things at the beginning. Then we learned to handle the new thing more carefully and now we are very very happy with it. Support is great. BTW - our next webserver will be Apache on a linux box, we want to reduce the load on the Mac and run only those sites there, which need the Mac (databases with WebCat for example...) Peter__________________________________________ Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.com Ostry & Partner - Ostry Internet Solutions Auhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austria fon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21 Peter Ostry

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Data loss (2016) Configuring E-mail (1997) Mac 4.0b2 Installer Problems (2000) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) popups, netscape vs explorer (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA and simple password systems (2009) DNS Lookup 2 (2000) WebCat for mass emailings (1997) Me know logical no need (2002) [WebDNA] Test (2009) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (2003) WebCat & WebTen (1997) Decimal point in search.... (2004) .. more on sliding discounts... (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) too many nested ... problem (1997) Trigger Happy (2005) WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997) CMS - Formatting Content (2004)