Re: [REPLACE] inside [FOUNDITEMS]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19204
interpreted = N
texte = >>>I don't believe that [replace] will change the [index] values (the >>>positions of the rows in the db), just the values in the database. >> >>I believe you are correct.This is not correct. Replace *can* change the index values, I've proven it in my testing ...>For my personal feeling [Replace] seems to be save when you have a >unique ID and use just this value as main parameter for [Replace].Yes, that's what I said earlier, but this only works if you do *not* use the replace context to change the unique ID -- and you must also be careful that any other fields you are changing do *not* appear in the search parameters. If either one of these situations occurs, it is possible for WebCat to change the wrong records, because the index values will probably change ...>Every programmer develops his personal style over time. For me, I never >ever give my program the chance to replace more than one record or delete >records from the same selection where I'm in at the moment.Neither [delete] nor [replace] will do what you're trying to avoid -- unless you use them INSIDE a founditems context -- so you're safe if you ONLY use replace and delete on their own, and never inside a founditems loop.Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>>I don't believe that
[replace] will change the [index] values (the >>>positions of the rows in the db), just the values in the database. >> >>I believe you are correct.This is not correct. Replace *can* change the index values, I've proven it in my testing ...>For my personal feeling
[replace] seems to be save when you have a >unique ID and use just this value as main parameter for
[replace].Yes, that's what I said earlier, but this only works if you do *not* use the replace context to change the unique ID -- and you must also be careful that any other fields you are changing do *not* appear in the search parameters. If either one of these situations occurs, it is possible for WebCat to change the wrong records, because the index values will probably change ...>Every programmer develops his personal style over time. For me, I never >ever give my program the chance to replace more than one record or delete >records from the same selection where I'm in at the moment.Neither
[delete] nor
[replace] will do what you're trying to avoid -- unless you use them INSIDE a founditems context -- so you're safe if you ONLY use replace and delete on their own, and never inside a founditems loop.Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Sort Order on a page search (1997)
OSX 10.2.6/iTools 7.0/WebDNA 5.0 installation (2003)
[lookup] again... (2003)
why am I getting an authenticate dialog with no [protect]? (2000)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Lookup Notfound (1998)
F*** you (1998)
WebCat2.0b15-to many nested [xx] tags (1997)
Not really WebCat- (1997)
Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (1997)
textarea inputs and returns (1999)
[WebDNA] Problem with SendMail - seems succesfull but nothing to (2016)
WC2b15 File Corruption (1997)
Error Messages Returned to User (1997)
Re:Emailer and encryption (1997)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
Re[2]: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison ri (1999)
extended ASCII with middle command (1999)
This list needs a digest: rant, rave... (1997)
can we get string variables? (1998)