Re: [REPLACE] inside [FOUNDITEMS]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19204
interpreted = N
texte = >>>I don't believe that [replace] will change the [index] values (the>>>positions of the rows in the db), just the values in the database.>>>>I believe you are correct.This is not correct. Replace *can* change the index values, I've proven it in my testing ...>For my personal feeling [Replace] seems to be save when you have a>unique ID and use just this value as main parameter for [Replace].Yes, that's what I said earlier, but this only works if you do *not* use the replace context to change the unique ID -- and you must also be careful that any other fields you are changing do *not* appear in the search parameters. If either one of these situations occurs, it is possible for WebCat to change the wrong records, because the index values will probably change ...>Every programmer develops his personal style over time. For me, I never>ever give my program the chance to replace more than one record or delete>records from the same selection where I'm in at the moment.Neither [delete] nor [replace] will do what you're trying to avoid -- unless you use them INSIDE a founditems context -- so you're safe if you ONLY use replace and delete on their own, and never inside a founditems loop.Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>>I don't believe that
[replace] will change the [index] values (the>>>positions of the rows in the db), just the values in the database.>>>>I believe you are correct.This is not correct. Replace *can* change the index values, I've proven it in my testing ...>For my personal feeling
[replace] seems to be save when you have a>unique ID and use just this value as main parameter for
[replace].Yes, that's what I said earlier, but this only works if you do *not* use the replace context to change the unique ID -- and you must also be careful that any other fields you are changing do *not* appear in the search parameters. If either one of these situations occurs, it is possible for WebCat to change the wrong records, because the index values will probably change ...>Every programmer develops his personal style over time. For me, I never>ever give my program the chance to replace more than one record or delete>records from the same selection where I'm in at the moment.Neither
[delete] nor
[replace] will do what you're trying to avoid -- unless you use them INSIDE a founditems context -- so you're safe if you ONLY use replace and delete on their own, and never inside a founditems loop.Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Authorize.net? (2003)
WebCat2b12 - New features for 1.6 users ... (1997)
Different Email recipients? (1998)
Help name our technology! (1997)
A Trigger Question (2000)
indexing dates (1998)
WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)
ShowNext for method=POST (1997)
Tech question about web dna actions (1998)
requiring form fields? (2000)
Sort Order on a page search (1997)
[append] and SSL (1997)
WebCat Problem? (1999)
WC2f3 (1997)
RE: Fishing: anyone on this group willing to do support? (1998)
Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
How to Display text in empty fields (1997)
WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)