Re: Grouping fields problem
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20699
interpreted = N
texte = are you using the acgi or the plugin? I had a lot of problems getting thethe acgi to work correctly with required fields in the past.>I think there's a bug when using the groupXfield technique. I tried a>search using these parameters:>>group1field=company>wogroup1datarq=GTE>group1word=ss>group2field=company>wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST>group2word=ss>>... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter:>>wocompanydatarq=GTE>>Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently>ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :(>>Does this indicate a bug?>Or is my technique wrong?>>By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the>search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result>... :(>>Sincerely,>Ken Grome>808-737-6499>WebDNA Solutions>mailto:ken@webdna.net>http://www.webdna.netBritt T.--------------------------------------------------------|| Britt@fishingworld.com || Britt@easttexas.com ||--------------------------------------------------------|| World Masters - || P.O. Box 1989 |||| Graphic Designs, || Lindale, TX 75771 |||| Web Site Development, || Phone: (903) 882-8877 |||| Web Site Hosting. || Fax: (903) 882-3110 ||--------------------------------------------------------
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
are you using the acgi or the plugin? I had a lot of problems getting thethe acgi to work correctly with required fields in the past.>I think there's a bug when using the groupXfield technique. I tried a>search using these parameters:>>group1field=company>wogroup1datarq=GTE>group1word=ss>group2field=company>wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST>group2word=ss>>... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter:>>wocompanydatarq=GTE>>Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently>ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :(>>Does this indicate a bug?>Or is my technique wrong?>>By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the>search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result>... :(>>Sincerely,>Ken Grome>808-737-6499>WebDNA Solutions>mailto:ken@webdna.net>http://www.webdna.netBritt T.--------------------------------------------------------|| Britt@fishingworld.com || Britt@easttexas.com ||--------------------------------------------------------|| World Masters - || P.O. Box 1989 |||| Graphic Designs, || Lindale, TX 75771 |||| Web Site Development, || Phone: (903) 882-8877 |||| Web Site Hosting. || Fax: (903) 882-3110 ||--------------------------------------------------------
Britt T.
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Multiple serial numbers (1997)
Search design (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
WebCatalog 4.0.2b5 available (2000)
PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997)
Problem (1997)
'does not contain' operator needed ... (1997)
Blog Aggregator (2006)
Commitdatabase tag (1998)
[WebDNA] OT: 2 php/MySQL & 1 Flash person needed FT (2008)
Associative lookup style? (1997)
tpl and Explorer (1998)
showcart problem, HELP! (1999)
formatting dates from a field ... (1997)
Cannot get subtotal to work (1997)
Strange Search Results (2004)
nslookup (2000)
upgrade? (1997)