Re: Grouping fields problem

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20699
interpreted = N
texte = are you using the acgi or the plugin? I had a lot of problems getting the the acgi to work correctly with required fields in the past. >I think there's a bug when using the groupXfield technique. I tried a >search using these parameters: > >group1field=company >wogroup1datarq=GTE >group1word=ss >group2field=company >wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST >group2word=ss > >... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter: > >wocompanydatarq=GTE > >Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently >ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :( > >Does this indicate a bug? >Or is my technique wrong? > >By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the >search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result >... :( > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.netBritt T. -------------------------------------------------------- || Britt@fishingworld.com || Britt@easttexas.com || -------------------------------------------------------- || World Masters - || P.O. Box 1989 || || Graphic Designs, || Lindale, TX 75771 || || Web Site Development, || Phone: (903) 882-8877 || || Web Site Hosting. || Fax: (903) 882-3110 || -------------------------------------------------------- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Grouping fields problem (John Hill 1998)
  2. Re: Grouping fields problem (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  3. Re: Grouping fields problem (Britt T. 1998)
  4. Re: Grouping fields problem (Britt T. 1998)
  5. Grouping fields problem (Kenneth Grome 1998)
are you using the acgi or the plugin? I had a lot of problems getting the the acgi to work correctly with required fields in the past. >I think there's a bug when using the groupXfield technique. I tried a >search using these parameters: > >group1field=company >wogroup1datarq=GTE >group1word=ss >group2field=company >wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST >group2word=ss > >... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter: > >wocompanydatarq=GTE > >Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently >ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :( > >Does this indicate a bug? >Or is my technique wrong? > >By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the >search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result >... :( > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.netBritt T. -------------------------------------------------------- || Britt@fishingworld.com || Britt@easttexas.com || -------------------------------------------------------- || World Masters - || P.O. Box 1989 || || Graphic Designs, || Lindale, TX 75771 || || Web Site Development, || Phone: (903) 882-8877 || || Web Site Hosting. || Fax: (903) 882-3110 || -------------------------------------------------------- Britt T.

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Multiple serial numbers (1997) Search design (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) WebCatalog 4.0.2b5 available (2000) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) Problem (1997) 'does not contain' operator needed ... (1997) Blog Aggregator (2006) Commitdatabase tag (1998) [WebDNA] OT: 2 php/MySQL & 1 Flash person needed FT (2008) Associative lookup style? (1997) tpl and Explorer (1998) showcart problem, HELP! (1999) formatting dates from a field ... (1997) Cannot get subtotal to work (1997) Strange Search Results (2004) nslookup (2000) upgrade? (1997)