Re: Relevancy Rating

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21788
interpreted = N
texte = WebCatalog uses a similar scheme internally, and in fact the search results are automatically sorted in this order already. We are interested in exposing relevance information, so it will probably show up in a later version>I actually use the # of search terms to calculate a simple relevancy >rating for our Sherlock plugin. > >predator = 1 word = 25% >predator aliens = 2 words = 50% >... >4 or greater words = 100% > >It's not perfect (all items in a single search instance have the same >relevance), but it's at least a rough measurement of overall >relevance. Matching 4 words is probably more relevant than >matching only 1 word in the grand scheme of things... > >Any chance a future version of Webcat will expose relevance inside >[founditems]?Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Relevancy Rating (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  2. Re: Relevancy Rating (Dale LaFountain 1998)
  3. Re: Relevancy Rating (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  4. Relevancy Rating (Michael Scott Davis 1998)
WebCatalog uses a similar scheme internally, and in fact the search results are automatically sorted in this order already. We are interested in exposing relevance information, so it will probably show up in a later version>I actually use the # of search terms to calculate a simple relevancy >rating for our Sherlock plugin. > >predator = 1 word = 25% >predator aliens = 2 words = 50% >... >4 or greater words = 100% > >It's not perfect (all items in a single search instance have the same >relevance), but it's at least a rough measurement of overall >relevance. Matching 4 words is probably more relevant than >matching only 1 word in the grand scheme of things... > >Any chance a future version of Webcat will expose relevance inside >[founditems]?Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ PCS Technical Support

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Template not found error messages (1997) Middle problem (2005) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) Erotic Sites (1997) Verifying and adding new users (1997) document contains no data (1999) Help getting [shownext] to increment (2003) Cookies and webcat (1997) Old code new problem? (2004) Applescript, WebDNA, and PDF (1997) Can't use old cart file (was One more try) (1997) [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (2000) Why is this search finding the right thing?! (2002) format search comparison Q (2000) customer.db and forms (1999) Storebuilder (2000) when is date system date or order date? (1997) [/application] error? (1997) Getting Total Quantity (1997) Error.html (1997)