Re: Dates - Search and Sorting

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 23023
interpreted = N
texte = DON'T use dateFIELD. nor dateTYPE nor dateSDIR, you see where I'm going. Field is used with talking about What fields are used in a group. I generally use TheDate AddDate, etc... as my field header.At 02:48 PM 1/27/99 -0800, you wrote: >Still stumped... > >I changed my date preferences to %m/%d/%y to they match the format of the >info in the database field, DateField. It had no affect. I tried to make >sure that the name of my field would not conflict with other DNA code by >changing it to DateField, no affect. There is still something I am missing. >Maybe someone else can see it ... > >One of those days :-) > >RH Prouty >bristol@ez-mortgage.com > >>> This may have something to do with the date prefs in your WebCatalog Prefs >>> file. >> >> hmm.. That could be.. >> >>>I think there are two different date preferences in that file, what >>> are yours set to? >> %B %d, %Y - yields - January 27, 1999 >> >> the only other preference I see is for time: >> >> %I:%M:%p >> >>> And what kind of date format are you using in your 'dated' field? >> >> day/month/year - as in 1/25/99 >>> >>> Another possibility is that the field name Dated could be confusing >>> webcat ... have you tried using a different field name? >> >> I tried changing this also. My search is now: >> >> [search db=mfiShares.db&eqMarkerdatarq=c&DateFieldtype=date&DateFieldsort=1] >> >> It also seems that another date sort on my site that was working is now not >> working. >> >> I am using webstar 3.02 and webcat 3.04b5 on a 266 G3. It would seem this >> is a simple search. I am not aware that the data must be stored in any kind >> of date format as long as you tell webcat it's Fieldtype=date is should >> treat it as such.... right? >Howard Wolosky ------------------------- Rutgers University Class of 2001 hwolosky@eden.rutgers.edu Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  2. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (Mike_Davis 1999)
  3. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (PCS Technical Support 1999)
  4. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  5. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (RH Prouty 1999)
  6. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (RH Prouty 1999)
  7. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (RH Prouty 1999)
  8. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (Howard Wolosky 1999)
  9. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  10. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (RH Prouty 1999)
  11. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (RH Prouty 1999)
  12. Re: Dates - Search and Sorting (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  13. Dates - Search and Sorting (RH Prouty 1999)
DON'T use dateFIELD. nor dateTYPE nor dateSDIR, you see where I'm going. Field is used with talking about What fields are used in a group. I generally use TheDate AddDate, etc... as my field header.At 02:48 PM 1/27/99 -0800, you wrote: >Still stumped... > >I changed my date preferences to %m/%d/%y to they match the format of the >info in the database field, DateField. It had no affect. I tried to make >sure that the name of my field would not conflict with other DNA code by >changing it to DateField, no affect. There is still something I am missing. >Maybe someone else can see it ... > >One of those days :-) > >RH Prouty >bristol@ez-mortgage.com > >>> This may have something to do with the date prefs in your WebCatalog Prefs >>> file. >> >> hmm.. That could be.. >> >>>I think there are two different date preferences in that file, what >>> are yours set to? >> %B %d, %Y - yields - January 27, 1999 >> >> the only other preference I see is for time: >> >> %I:%M:%p >> >>> And what kind of date format are you using in your 'dated' field? >> >> day/month/year - as in 1/25/99 >>> >>> Another possibility is that the field name Dated could be confusing >>> webcat ... have you tried using a different field name? >> >> I tried changing this also. My search is now: >> >> [search db=mfiShares.db&eqMarkerdatarq=c&DateFieldtype=date&DateFieldsort=1] >> >> It also seems that another date sort on my site that was working is now not >> working. >> >> I am using webstar 3.02 and webcat 3.04b5 on a 266 G3. It would seem this >> is a simple search. I am not aware that the data must be stored in any kind >> of date format as long as you tell webcat it's Fieldtype=date is should >> treat it as such.... right? >Howard Wolosky ------------------------- Rutgers University Class of 2001 hwolosky@eden.rutgers.edu Howard Wolosky

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Incorrect Value Display (2000) writefile and texte (1997) WebDNA Freelancer Needed (2002) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) RE: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) ListVariables Problem (2003) Wanted: More Math Functions (or, Can You Solve This?) (1997) ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) simple help (1999) SendTo more emails (1998) HELP WITH DATES (1997) template includes encrypted template (1999) Login and pass variables to [protect] tag (2001) [taxRate] [TaxTotal] ? (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - more [date] problems (1997) [isfile] ? (1997) Access Denied! But why? (1997) [sendmail] questions... (1997)