Re: &fieldsdir=ra truely random??
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 26412
interpreted = N
texte = >Heh - PHP can do pretty much most of what WebCat can do and it's FREE!I know, I've been looking at it. The fact is, PHP is far better at parsing text than any of webcat's unreasonably-limited text parsing routines. PCS seems to be sleeping while faster better cheaper programs take over their territory ...Even Steve Crisp's MGI is a breeze to setup in terms of eCommerce. Webcat is *very* difficult in comparison ...What's more, MGI can limit its actions to only those items within the folder hierarchy of the current templates. In other words, a pissed MGI customer cannot trash other people's sites by uploading a MGI template. That makes it SECURE, whereas webcat fails to offer this ability, so webcat sites can be hacked by anyone with upload privileges. >I wonder if SM is just tired of WebCat.Sure seems like it, doesn't it?================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Heh - PHP can do pretty much most of what WebCat can do and it's FREE!I know, I've been looking at it. The fact is, PHP is far better at parsing text than any of webcat's unreasonably-limited text parsing routines. PCS seems to be sleeping while faster better cheaper programs take over their territory ...Even Steve Crisp's MGI is a breeze to setup in terms of eCommerce. Webcat is *very* difficult in comparison ...What's more, MGI can limit its actions to only those items within the folder hierarchy of the current templates. In other words, a pissed MGI customer cannot trash other people's sites by uploading a MGI template. That makes it SECURE, whereas webcat fails to offer this ability, so webcat sites can be hacked by anyone with upload privileges. >I wonder if SM is just tired of WebCat.Sure seems like it, doesn't it?================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[SHOWIF]s and empty arguments (1997)
Frames (1997)
Post Test (2008)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
WebCat editing, SiteGuard WAS:SiteAssociative lookup style? (1997)
WebCatalog NT beta 18 problem (1997)
WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)
Search or Lookup before Append (1998)
[math date]: Arrrggh! (2003)
lookup command (1999)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Server slowing down. (1997)
WebDNA to IM connectivity? (2006)
[WebDNA] Combining searches with blank and zero values? (2011)
Nested vs conditional (1997)
Loops in increments of .25 (2002)
Suffix Mapping (1997)
Associative lookup style? (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
Success Stories (1997)