Re: nslookup <for Bob>

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27011
interpreted = N
texte = Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote:> If I were you, I would wait for WC 4.0 > > NS Lookup might be a little out of your league. > > I said: might be (In case some real programmers were hidden amoung us).Uh, was that directed at Bob or me? and why? Doing a tcconnect to a linux box, sending a username and password and retrieving the result of a nslookupdoesn't seem to freeking difficult. I did a whois lookup with netevents, doesn't *seem* much harder.Like I said I don't have 3, so I've used [tcpconnect] exactly once. I'm pretty sure that if this were my project, I could figgure it out... Bob's a smart guy, I think he can figure it out too.Or, were you not even trying to be insulting? Because that's how it *seems* to me.-A-------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  2. Re: nslookup (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  3. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  4. Re: nslookup (Bob Minor 2000)
  5. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  6. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  7. Re: nslookup (Bob Minor 2000)
  8. Re: nslookup (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  9. nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote:> If I were you, I would wait for WC 4.0 > > NS Lookup might be a little out of your league. > > I said: might be (In case some real programmers were hidden amoung us).Uh, was that directed at Bob or me? and why? Doing a tcconnect to a linux box, sending a username and password and retrieving the result of a nslookupdoesn't seem to freeking difficult. I did a whois lookup with netevents, doesn't *seem* much harder.Like I said I don't have 3, so I've used [tcpconnect] exactly once. I'm pretty sure that if this were my project, I could figgure it out... Bob's a smart guy, I think he can figure it out too.Or, were you not even trying to be insulting? Because that's how it *seems* to me.-A-------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Aaron Lynch

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Search for dates greater than [date] (1997) Problem with a search context (2005) URGENT - CPU usage OSXS (2001) Emailer (1998) Weird bug, or is there something amiss? (1997) case sensitivity in lookups (1997) RE: [redirect] w/o showing args? (1999) Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997) So many lookers, hey smith micro (2003) separate by mont (search) (2002) PIXO support (1997) Listserver problem (1997) Sendmail error 17152 - Another Discovery! (2000) multiple search commands (1997) New commands in Final candidate (1997) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) 4.5.1 for OSX (2003) Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998) Firewalls - What's Good? (1999) Mark your calendar for September 19th (2003)