Optimizing [founditems]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27116
interpreted = N
texte = Just curious:I state, a search can be considered as active until [/search]. So weshould keep the code within the search context as short as possible.Most responsibe for speed is:1 - The amount of code in the whole template (loading time).2 - The type of search (complex or not).3 - The amount and complexity of code within [founditems].4 - Available RAM, number and size of loaded databases.Example 1Single [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [showif [MyVariable]=on] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------I do this most times and (shame) I believe it is the worst method. we haveto load one huge page first, then validate all showif's within [founditems].And showif's can get much more complex than in the example!Example 2Two [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [showif [MyVariable]=on] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif][/search]---------------------------------------Overall code is equal, but less to do within [founditems]. Might fit betterfor medium size. I think about adopting this method for all rather shortstandard searches. Nonsense? Just theory?Example 3One [founditems] and different include'sdepending on a multi-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [include result_[MyVariable].inc] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------5 Lines only and loading just what needed. It requires more templates, butis still maintainable.Now my question:Does example 3 give us most possible speed, or might we loose performancewhile loading files from disk?Peter-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Optimizing [founditems] (Peter Ostry 2000)
|
Just curious:I state, a search can be considered as active until [/search]. So weshould keep the code within the search context as short as possible.Most responsibe for speed is:1 - The amount of code in the whole template (loading time).2 - The type of search (complex or not).3 - The amount and complexity of code within [founditems].4 - Available RAM, number and size of loaded databases.Example 1Single [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [showif [MyVariable]=on] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------I do this most times and (shame) I believe it is the worst method. we haveto load one huge page first, then validate all showif's within [founditems].And showif's can get much more complex than in the example!Example 2Two [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [showif [MyVariable]=on] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif][/search]---------------------------------------Overall code is equal, but less to do within [founditems]. Might fit betterfor medium size. I think about adopting this method for all rather shortstandard searches. Nonsense? Just theory?Example 3One [founditems] and different include'sdepending on a multi-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [include result_[MyVariable].inc] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------5 Lines only and loading just what needed. It requires more templates, butis still maintainable.Now my question:Does example 3 give us most possible speed, or might we loose performancewhile loading files from disk?Peter-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
security (1997)
Un[url]ize (1999)
Here we go again...WebDNA - SQL- Clustering (2006)
emailer (1997)
WC2b15 File Corruption (1997)
Converting order file to database (1998)
[SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997)
serial number not working (1998)
[ShowIf] and empty fields (1997)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
writing db to disk (1997)
Server slowing down. (1997)
SiteGuard Admin Feature ? (1997)
[OT] Who's got a cool link (2002)
Installation webCatalog (French speakers please help) (1998)
What week is first? (1998)
Vote: ELSE (2002)
It finally happened ... (2003)
Not really WebCat (1997)
db security on NT (1997)