Re: DB Field Name?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 28837
interpreted = N
texte = Interesting Idea. Thanks Jesse Proudman - NineWire Productions http://www.ninewire.com <-> jesse@ninewire.com Innovative and Creative Web Design and Hosting> -----Original Message----- > From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On > Behalf Of Joseph D'Andrea > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 8:24 PM > To: WebCatalog Talk > Subject: Re: DB Field Name? > > > At 8:17 PM -0800 3/9/00, Jesse Williams Proudman wrote: > >Okie - I changed it to groupname. > > You might want to start implementing your own coding convention of > naming fields. Why not use something like: db_ as a prefix for every > database field. This way you're guaranteed not to interfere with and > [current] reserved names. You could even name all your text variables > t_ and your form variables f_ and of course math variables m_... > > As someone who has gotten bitten by using a reserved word as a > database field name... I've switched to a naming convention like the > one I just described. > > ___Joe___ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Interesting Idea. Thanks Jesse Proudman - NineWire Productions http://www.ninewire.com <-> jesse@ninewire.com Innovative and Creative Web Design and Hosting> -----Original Message----- > From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On > Behalf Of Joseph D'Andrea > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 8:24 PM > To: WebCatalog Talk > Subject: Re: DB Field Name? > > > At 8:17 PM -0800 3/9/00, Jesse Williams Proudman wrote: > >Okie - I changed it to groupname. > > You might want to start implementing your own coding convention of > naming fields. Why not use something like: db_ as a prefix for every > database field. This way you're guaranteed not to interfere with and > [current] reserved names. You could even name all your text variables > t_ and your form variables f_ and of course math variables m_... > > As someone who has gotten bitten by using a reserved word as a > database field name... I've switched to a naming convention like the > one I just described. > > ___Joe___ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Jesse Williams Proudman
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Who's going to MacWorld? (1999)
addlineitems (2003)
Paranoid about serial numbers...not (1998)
[WebDNA] Sorry WebDNA server not running (2014)
RE: How to verify email address (1997)
[Sum] function? (1997)
page redirect in webDNA (1997)
Showif probably dumb question (1997)
GuestBook example (1997)
Listfiles on network with NT (2000)
time and welcome (1999)
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
Online reference (1997)
redirect with frames (1997)
Misc Stuff That Might Help (1997)
[WebDNA] Test - no messages since 9th of June 2009. (2009)
Secure server question (1997)
credit card (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)