Re: What abobut variables named max ???
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29273
interpreted = N
texte = >but I thought values generated from a [search] were SUPPOSED to override [math] and [text] values.... this is what you told me several weeks ago.I think you missed some important parts of my description. I wrote a pretty good explanation of webcat variable hierarchies some time last year, I assume it's still in the archives if you want to search for it.In this situation however, my search is not generating any code that can change the max value which is passed into the search context, and the [max] tag is not inside a founditems context either, so it is not being overridden by a database field named max. It is simply being changed to zero by a bug. >So if the [search] indeeds finds 0 records then it seems like proper behaviour, no?No, the value of [max] should ALWAYS be 9 unless I change it in my webdna code. In this case, webcatalog is changing it, not me and not my webdna code.================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>but I thought values generated from a [search] were SUPPOSED to override [math] and [text] values.... this is what you told me several weeks ago.I think you missed some important parts of my description. I wrote a pretty good explanation of webcat variable hierarchies some time last year, I assume it's still in the archives if you want to search for it.In this situation however, my search is not generating any code that can change the max value which is passed into the search context, and the [max] tag is not inside a founditems context either, so it is not being overridden by a database field named max. It is simply being changed to zero by a bug. >So if the [search] indeeds finds 0 records then it seems like proper behaviour, no?No, the value of [max] should ALWAYS be 9 unless I change it in my webdna code. In this case, webcatalog is changing it, not me and not my webdna code.================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[WebDNA] Help me install WebDNA (2012)
autosensing lanague selection (1997)
problems with 2 tags shakur (1997)
[WebDNA] Triggers not working (2011)
MySolution - was - help with duplicate records posted (1998)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
[WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (2010)
NEVERMIND! New syntax (2000)
Initiating NewCart (1997)
corrupted jpgs (2003)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
SUMM=T does not summarize by the sort parameters ... (2003)
Alternating BGColors in Table Rows (1998)
[WebDNA] Serial numbers and pricing for WebDNA 7.0 (2011)
Orders coming up blank (2004)
How to show via drop down menu? (2000)
WebSite and *NO* Authentication Dialog Box!!? (1998)
[WebDNA] [OT] - One Man. One Road. (2009)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
tcpconnect (1999)