Re: Hierarchy of form/text/math variables
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31117
interpreted = N
texte = Once I figured out how to use Ken's system so that I could keep the form and the form action on the same template allowing me to display the form with blank values the first time through and with entered values when redisplaying for an error condition... I've used it everywhere. Please add another vote in the keep thing the way they are category. John Butler's idea seems great and is usable right now.At 7:43 AM 5/1/00, John Butler wrote: >for me so far, this kind of thing: > >> When I depend on variables to be secure, I run a routine at the top of the >> page similar to this: >> [formvariables] >> [showif [name]^SecureUser,IsValidAccount,IsAdmin] >> [authenticate Futile Hacker] >> [/showif] >> [/formvariables] > >has been security and simplicity enough. I rely on overrideable >vars much more than I >need to check for hackers using the security hole... >I don't see why simply providing this in the docs wouldn't be all >that is needed here. > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Once I figured out how to use Ken's system so that I could keep the form and the form action on the same template allowing me to display the form with blank values the first time through and with entered values when redisplaying for an error condition... I've used it everywhere. Please add another vote in the keep thing the way they are category. John Butler's idea seems great and is usable right now.At 7:43 AM 5/1/00, John Butler wrote: >for me so far, this kind of thing: > >> When I depend on variables to be secure, I run a routine at the top of the >> page similar to this: >> [formvariables] >> [showif [name]^SecureUser,IsValidAccount,IsAdmin] >> [authenticate Futile Hacker] >> [/showif] >> [/formvariables] > >has been security and simplicity enough. I rely on overrideable >vars much more than I >need to check for hackers using the security hole... >I don't see why simply providing this in the docs wouldn't be all >that is needed here. > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Joseph D'Andrea
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Notepad problems (1998)
RE: IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997)
Searching multiple fields from one form field (1997)
Announce: Bug fix talk list (1999)
[Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
Roundup function? (1997)
Multiple download orders of the same product? (1997)
Emailer port change (1997)
what characters are replaced for tab and CR? (1998)
Big Databases (1997)
Change in Host? (1999)
problems with 2 tags shakur (1997)
Showif for mulitple variations (1997)
OT: Poll Please (2002)
formatting search results (1999)
Not really WebCat- (1997)
NT vs Mac (1997)
thisurl & arguments (2000)
[trim]?! (2004)