Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31165
interpreted = N
texte = > >Have you decided whether or not to reinstate the version 3 variable >>hierarchy? Please let us know if and when you do so, it is very >>important to many of us, thanks ... :) > >The default behavior will not be the un-secure style. Still working >on a way to deal with your true issue, which is to find a nicer way >of filling in default form fields.I'm glad you're going with the secure style as default, but I'd like to throw in a vote for Jesse Proudman's idea of adding a new parameter to the [TEXT]/[MATH] tags. I think he suggested [TEXT SECURE=T/F]. It would certainly be easy to change sites with a find-and-replace, plus it gives people some more choice when designing a site. And, hey, isn't choice what this great country is all about?Michael############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Nitai @ Eyework 2000)
  2. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Pat McCormick 2000)
  3. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  4. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  5. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  6. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  7. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  8. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Thomas Wedderburn-Bisshop 2000)
  9. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Michael Winston 2000)
  10. Re: Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  11. Status of variable hierarchy changes? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
> >Have you decided whether or not to reinstate the version 3 variable >>hierarchy? Please let us know if and when you do so, it is very >>important to many of us, thanks ... :) > >The default behavior will not be the un-secure style. Still working >on a way to deal with your true issue, which is to find a nicer way >of filling in default form fields.I'm glad you're going with the secure style as default, but I'd like to throw in a vote for Jesse Proudman's idea of adding a new parameter to the [text]/[math] tags. I think he suggested [TEXT SECURE=T/F]. It would certainly be easy to change sites with a find-and-replace, plus it gives people some more choice when designing a site. And, hey, isn't choice what this great country is all about?Michael############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Michael Winston

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

format_to_days on NT (1997) [WebDNA] Video Request: "Faces of WebDNA" (2010) More on the email templates (I like it) (1997) Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997) Sendmail (1998) [applescript] (1999) Database Field Additions (2000) Problems with [Applescript] (1997) PCS Frames (1997) web merchant (2000) Another IfThenElse question.. (2003) Wrapping text (1998) Need formum software... (2003) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) RE: Subtotal help (1997) [ShowIf] a either fields are blank (1998) WebCatalog NT beta 18 problem (1997) W* 3.x & WebCat + WebMerchant (1998) Authorize.Net and AIM (2004) Document Contains No Data! (1997)