Re: placement of <!--HAS_WEBDNA_TAGS--> ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31829
interpreted = N
texte = Ok then, which is faster to parse-1) moving it down to just inside the HTML tag, or 2) leaving it at the top and wrapping it in a webcat comment context [!]...[/!]And how much speed are we talking about- A fairly big difference or a probably insignificant difference? ?Kenneth Grome wrote:> >Does the comment > >have to be at the very top of the doc? > >Our search engine people want to bring it down just inside the > > tag. Assuming there is no > >webcat code above that am I safe? > > Try this and your search engine people will never see it no matter where it is: > > [!][/!] > > ================================ > Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant > 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net > ================================ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: placement of ? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  2. Re: placement of ? (John Butler 2000)
  3. Re: placement of ? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  4. Re: placement of ? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  5. Re: placement of ? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  6. Re: placement of ? (John Butler 2000)
  7. Re: placement of ? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  8. Re: placement of ? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  9. placement of ? (John Butler 2000)
Ok then, which is faster to parse-1) moving it down to just inside the HTML tag, or 2) leaving it at the top and wrapping it in a webcat comment context [!]...[/!]And how much speed are we talking about- A fairly big difference or a probably insignificant difference? ?Kenneth Grome wrote:> >Does the comment > >have to be at the very top of the doc? > >Our search engine people want to bring it down just inside the > > tag. Assuming there is no > >webcat code above that am I safe? > > Try this and your search engine people will never see it no matter where it is: > > [!][/!] > > ================================ > Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant > 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net > ================================ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ John Butler

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Smart caching problems with 2.1b3? (1997) [WebDNA] Small Parsing Problem (2009) no global [username] or [password] displayed ... (1997) [input] [/input] (1997) More on [purchase] (1998) inetinfo.exe (1999) IE Cache Problems... (1999) [shownext max=?] armed (1997) Upcoming 2.1 Release and PCS Committment (1997) Tcp connect (2002) Need formatting help (1998) relational db question (2002) Merging databases (1997) Upgrade Problem.... (1998) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) Robert Minor duplicate mail (1997) [searchString] (1997) Mime Headers for Mail (1998) Is grep not working with umlauts? (2002) Can he do that? (1998)