Re: loops

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 34408
interpreted = N
texte = >Are just the interior items reinterpreted, or are the parameters to the >loop as well? > >For example, the original post had the loop: > >[loop start=0&end=86400&advance=[math]([lookup >db=dbs/Vendors.db&lookinfield=VendorID&value=[vendid]&returnfield=TimeIncr] >)*60[/math]] > >Would the [lookup] be performed once, or repeatedly for each iteration of >the loop?Good point. The parameters are only evaluated once, so the lookup would only be performed once.Technical Support ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development WebCatalog Support: (858) 675-0632 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 **********************************------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Christer Olsson 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Brian Fries 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Govinda 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  18. [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  19. [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  20. WenDNA infinite loops (1 issue solved) ( Brian B. Burton 2004)
  21. Re: Loops in increments of .25 (Gary Krockover 2002)
  22. Re: Loops in increments of .25 (John Peacock 2002)
  23. Re: Loops in increments of .25 (Gary Krockover 2002)
  24. Re: Loops in increments of .25 (Alex McCombie 2002)
  25. Loops in increments of .25 (Gary Krockover 2002)
  26. Re: loops (WebDNA Support 2000)
  27. Re: loops (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  28. Re: loops (WebDNA Support 2000)
  29. Re: loops (Jaishankar Jayaram 2000)
  30. Re: loops (Peter Werno 2000)
  31. Re: loops (Jaishankar Jayaram 2000)
  32. Re: loops (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  33. Re: loops (Jaishankar Jayaram 2000)
  34. loops (Jaishankar Jayaram 2000)
  35. Re: loops (WebDNA Support 2000)
  36. Re: loops (Dale 2000)
  37. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Dale LaFountain 2000)
  38. Re: REPOST: Large founditems loops (Theodor Paleolog 2000)
  39. Re: REPOST: Large founditems loops (Serban Constantinescu 2000)
  40. Re: REPOST: Large founditems loops (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  41. Re: REPOST: Large founditems loops (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  42. Re: REPOST: Large founditems loops (Derek C. 2000)
  43. Re: REPOST: Large founditems loops (Mike Davis 2000)
  44. REPOST: Large founditems loops (Derek C. 2000)
  45. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (dale@gmr.dresdner.net 2000)
  46. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (John Butler 2000)
  47. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Derek C. 2000)
  48. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Charles Kline 2000)
  49. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  50. Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  51. Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (John Butler 2000)
  52. Re: Large founditems loops (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  53. Re: Large founditems loops (Derek C. 2000)
  54. Re: Large founditems loops (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  55. Re: Large founditems loops (Derek C. 2000)
  56. Re: Large founditems loops (Derek C. 2000)
  57. Re: Large founditems loops (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  58. Large founditems loops (Derek C. 2000)
  59. Re: Loops N Variables (The Mooseman 1998)
  60. Re: Loops N Variables (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  61. Re: Loops N Variables (Peter Ostry 1998)
  62. Re: Loops N Variables (The Mooseman 1998)
  63. Re: Loops N Variables (Bob Minor 1998)
  64. Re: Loops N Variables (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  65. Loops N Variables (The Mooseman 1998)
  66. Re: Loops and [index] (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  67. Re: Loops and [index] (Trevor Crist 1998)
  68. Re: Loops and [index] (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  69. Loops and [index] (webmaster@textileweb.net (Bill Norman) 1998)
  70. reverse loops (Olin 1998)
  71. Re: Nested Loops and SHOWIFs (Michael Winston 1997)
  72. Re: Nested Loops and SHOWIFs (Michael Winston 1997)
  73. Re: Nested Loops and SHOWIFs (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  74. Re: Nested Loops and SHOWIFs (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  75. Nested Loops and SHOWIFs (Michael Winston 1997)
>Are just the interior items reinterpreted, or are the parameters to the >loop as well? > >For example, the original post had the loop: > >[loop start=0&end=86400&advance=[math]([lookup >db=dbs/Vendors.db&lookinfield=VendorID&value=[vendid]&returnfield=TimeIncr] >)*60[/math]] > >Would the [lookup] be performed once, or repeatedly for each iteration of >the loop?Good point. The parameters are only evaluated once, so the lookup would only be performed once.Technical Support ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development WebCatalog Support: (858) 675-0632 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 **********************************------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ WebDNA Support

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

You are not allowed to change the price (2003) WebCatalog NT beta 18 problem (1997) Problem with summary on date / inconsequent webcat behaviour (1998) For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997) Re:quit command on NT (1997) [WebDNA] GREP problem (2011) Is this possible in simple search? question? (1998) Resume Catalog ? (1997) ShowNext Questions (2000) Make sure I understand this??? (1997) Download Question (1997) Bad Cookie (1998) Exclamation point (1997) upgrading (1997) Showing formatted results in tables (2002) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) WebDNA 5.0 Questions (2003) Re:Copyright ? (1997) [WebDNA] [BULK] Web Merchant Authorize net issues (2011) delayed email response (2005)