Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35522
interpreted = N
texte = I would then suspect that issueing this tag will first flush the database to disk, then lock it? Otherwise it's pointless I think... -- Sincerely, Bob Sneidar Systems Manager The Word For Today> From: Glenn Busbin > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:39:10 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? > > I found this in the archives. It's from 1998, so it must apply to WC3. > >>> Is [ExclusiveLock] an officially supported tag now? >> It's not officially supported yet, but we believe it won't harm >> anything to use it either. We want to make it multidatabase-aware >> before we officially announce it and roll it into the product. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  2. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Emily Bonck 2000)
  3. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  4. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (John Peacock 2000)
  5. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  6. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  7. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  8. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  9. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  10. exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (John Butler 2000)
I would then suspect that issueing this tag will first flush the database to disk, then lock it? Otherwise it's pointless I think... -- Sincerely, Bob Sneidar Systems Manager The Word For Today> From: Glenn Busbin > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:39:10 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? > > I found this in the archives. It's from 1998, so it must apply to WC3. > >>> Is [exclusivelock] an officially supported tag now? >> It's not officially supported yet, but we believe it won't harm >> anything to use it either. We want to make it multidatabase-aware >> before we officially announce it and roll it into the product. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Sneidar

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

F2 to F3 rocky transition (1997) I'm tired of all this! (2000) Can't load tmpl files (1997) WebDNA-Talk Digests (1997) about this server and links to who (1997) Template Encryption (1998) Looking for a Manual (1997) writing db to disk (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997) RE: [WebDNA] tcp connect is slow...any ways to speed it up? (2008) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Note added to [sendmail] in Docs (2004) [sendmail] on NT? (1997) Replace Statement (1997) Contribution (2000) Monthly Help File (1999) no [search] with NT (1997) SERIAL NUMBER PROBLEM *AGAIN*!!! (1998)