Re: delete fails
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35541
interpreted = N
texte = Christopher Mackay wrote:> Browser caching? Well, to this I have two responses: 1) Internet> Explorer is almost exclusively the over-zealous caching culprit, not> Netscapewhat many find> and 2) caching doesn't explain why it would work six times> in a row and then stop working on the seventh.to be sure it is working you need to actually view the content of the orderfileitself, thus not relying on the browser before you decide what is really happening...>>> Or am I just confused?>> The previous response (Robert Wade) said that the code was wrong. Specifically,>> 1. You should be using command not action.> 2. You should be using remove to remove a lineitem not delete.> Delete is used for deleting records in a database not lineitems in a> cart file.>> If so, why didn't SM Tech Support pick up on this,They probably thought of the caching issue (like I did) before even taking a close lookat the code> and why is it> coded this way at all, given that this is the SmithMicro StoreBuilder> code I'm using?good Q. I assume storebuilder has code that sees if there is a formvar coming in namedacttion with a value of delete, if so - then it will do the right thing (probablyuses [removelineitem] context...)-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Christopher Mackay wrote:> Browser caching? Well, to this I have two responses: 1) Internet> Explorer is almost exclusively the over-zealous caching culprit, not> Netscapewhat many find> and 2) caching doesn't explain why it would work six times> in a row and then stop working on the seventh.to be sure it is working you need to actually view the content of the orderfileitself, thus not relying on the browser before you decide what is really happening...>>> Or am I just confused?>> The previous response (Robert Wade) said that the code was wrong. Specifically,>> 1. You should be using command not action.> 2. You should be using remove to remove a lineitem not delete.> Delete is used for deleting records in a database not lineitems in a> cart file.>> If so, why didn't SM Tech Support pick up on this,They probably thought of the caching issue (like I did) before even taking a close lookat the code> and why is it> coded this way at all, given that this is the SmithMicro StoreBuilder> code I'm using?good Q. I assume storebuilder has code that sees if there is a formvar coming in namedacttion with a value of delete, if so - then it will do the right thing (probablyuses [removelineitem] context...)-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
John Butler
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Summing fields (1997)
webcat and OS 8 (1997)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
move files (2000)
[cart] clarification... (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Plain Language Manual? (1998)
[OT] SSL (2003)
WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997)
Order not created error (never mind) (1997)
How do I specify a & character in Grep? (2000)
Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997)
RE: IIS 4 (1998)
The Form authentication trick (2000)
Problems with [Applescript] (1997)
Cancel Subscription (1996)
Target wit redirect (1998)
REPOST: How do _you_ back up your db? (2000)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
WebCat 4.0.1 HTTP_REFERRER over 255 char bug (2000)