Re: [OT] search engine Q
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2001
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 38381
interpreted = N
texte = YES!!! From the docs...Putting [REDIRECT http://www.smithmicro.com/] in your template will forcethe remote browser to immediately 'jump' to the new location specified,rather than displaying whatever is in the template. Any other text in thetemplate will be ignored.Let me repeat...ANY OTHER TEXT IN THE TEMPLATE WILL BE IGNORED. I tried it,only to fail after three consecutive months of search engineregistration...only DMOZ and YAHOO! listed the site (by hand).I suppose all the spiders just passed over. I thought they may follow theredirect, but apparently not. I re-registered the fourth month with someminor changes for testing. The site registered within 2 weeks on most ofthe sites that I had previous problems with.If you find a way around it (I usually use bridge pages anyway) let usknow!!Kim-----Original Message-----From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]OnBehalf Of Will StarckSent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:32 AMTo: WebCatalog TalkSubject: [OT] search engine QDoes anyone know if a [redirect] at the bottom of an index page willnegatively affect search engine rankings?Will StarckNovaDermskin care sciencesupport@novaderm.com800-378-1740-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
YES!!! From the docs...Putting [REDIRECT http://www.smithmicro.com/] in your template will forcethe remote browser to immediately 'jump' to the new location specified,rather than displaying whatever is in the template. Any other text in thetemplate will be ignored.Let me repeat...ANY OTHER TEXT IN THE TEMPLATE WILL BE IGNORED. I tried it,only to fail after three consecutive months of search engineregistration...only DMOZ and YAHOO! listed the site (by hand).I suppose all the spiders just passed over. I thought they may follow theredirect, but apparently not. I re-registered the fourth month with someminor changes for testing. The site registered within 2 weeks on most ofthe sites that I had previous problems with.If you find a way around it (I usually use bridge pages anyway) let usknow!!Kim-----Original Message-----From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]OnBehalf Of Will StarckSent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:32 AMTo: WebCatalog TalkSubject: [OT] search engine QDoes anyone know if a [redirect] at the bottom of an index page willnegatively affect search engine rankings?Will StarckNovaDermskin care sciencesupport@novaderm.com800-378-1740-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Kimberly Ingram
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
4.5 Upgrade (2003)
CAPTCHA system in webDNA (2005)
Email encryption (1998)
my SOS last week... (1996)
Searching multiple Databases (1997)
Template Encrypt Speed (1998)
Listfiles (1998)
webcatalog [date] bug...not (1999)
WebCatalog and WebMerchant reviewed by InfoWorld (1997)
Help! Strange happenings... (1997)
Updating a database once per day - An example (1998)
multi-paragraph fields (1997)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
Talk List Suggestions (1997)
Rhapsody? (1997)
Webcat bannersleuth Qs (2001)
Encrypt/Decrypt (2007)
Permissions / Restart WebDNA? (2005)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)