Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41105
interpreted = N
texte = > If I understand your concept above you would be able to add unmatched > records to the found set, but that essentially alters the > found set. The 'found' set would contain only those records that did not match the search query.> -----Original Message----- > From: WebCatalog Talk > [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf > Of Alex McCombie > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:54 PM > To: WebCatalog Talk > Subject: Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? > > > On 7/1/02 1:40 PM, Larry Goodhew wrote: > > > This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should > probably be qualified > > by > >> a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] > then instead of a > >> new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [FoundItems] > context to display > >> the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search > attributes and aggregates > >> could > >> still be applied. > >> > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > >> > >> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak up'. > > I understand where you're headed with the unmatched=T but > then again, one of > the things lost is the ability to have a found set and then > an unfound set. > > If I understand your concept above you would be able to add unmatched > records to the found set, but that essentially alters the > found set. If on > the other hand my goal was to compare the found set to the > unfound set, it > wouldn't work for that...barring 2 searches and temp Dbs. > > > Thinking there would great use for: > Search > founditems > /founditems > notfound > /notfound > /search > > > > > > > Alex J McCombie New World Media > Chief Information Officer Drawer 607 > 800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064 > Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com > > Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Donovan 2002)
  2. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  3. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  4. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Stuart Tremain 2002)
  5. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Alex McCombie 2002)
  6. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Scott Anderson 2002)
  7. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (John Peacock 2002)
  8. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Gary Krockover 2002)
  9. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Clayton Randall 2002)
  10. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Larry Goodhew 2002)
  11. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Scott Anderson 2002)
  12. Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Tim Robinson 2002)
  13. SMSI -- a [notfound] context? (Kenneth Grome 2002)
> If I understand your concept above you would be able to add unmatched > records to the found set, but that essentially alters the > found set. The 'found' set would contain only those records that did not match the search query.> -----Original Message----- > From: WebCatalog Talk > [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf > Of Alex McCombie > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:54 PM > To: WebCatalog Talk > Subject: Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context? > > > On 7/1/02 1:40 PM, Larry Goodhew wrote: > > > This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should > probably be qualified > > by > >> a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] > then instead of a > >> new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [founditems] > context to display > >> the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search > attributes and aggregates > >> could > >> still be applied. > >> > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > >> > >> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak up'. > > I understand where you're headed with the unmatched=T but > then again, one of > the things lost is the ability to have a found set and then > an unfound set. > > If I understand your concept above you would be able to add unmatched > records to the found set, but that essentially alters the > found set. If on > the other hand my goal was to compare the found set to the > unfound set, it > wouldn't work for that...barring 2 searches and temp Dbs. > > > Thinking there would great use for: > Search > founditems > /founditems > notfound > /notfound > /search > > > > > > > Alex J McCombie New World Media > Chief Information Officer Drawer 607 > 800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064 > Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com > > Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Scott Anderson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Currency Conversion (2003) SKU (1997) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) Setting up shop (1997) WebCat and Flash (2000) Emailer (1997) Log entry (1999) ShowNext truncating passed variable?? (1997) Firesite cache vs webcat cache (1997) WC2/Mac -- Forms not submitting correctly with Mac browsers (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) SiteEdit Pro Update Announcement (1997) PIXO Support (1997) Shownext - am i missing something? (1998) Progress !! WAS: Trouble with formula.db (1997) ODBC Performance? (2001) New command suggestion (was Modifying databases manually) (1997) Null Chars (1999) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) math on date? (1997)