Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41124
interpreted = N
texte = O.K., don't mean to be a deviant from the status quoe here (and I couldjust be missing something (wouldn't be the first time)) but wouldn't Scottsexample be redundant in a way? can't a person do a search on records for theunmatchedalready? One can search for just about anything.I think the value of manipulating unmatched records is also having the matched[founditems] records???So [search db=][founditems][founditems][unmatched][unmatched][/search]would give more ability than[search db=&unmatched=T][founditems][/founditems][/search]Granted, I don't what kind of performance problemsthe extra loop in the search context could give.Just some thoughts.DonovanScott Anderson wrote:> This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should probably be qualified> by a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] then instead> of a new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [FoundItems] context to> display the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search attributes and> aggregates could still be applied.>> Thanks for the suggestion.>> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak up'.>>-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
O.K., don't mean to be a deviant from the status quoe here (and I couldjust be missing something (wouldn't be the first time)) but wouldn't Scottsexample be redundant in a way? can't a person do a search on records for theunmatchedalready? One can search for just about anything.I think the value of manipulating unmatched records is also having the matched[founditems] records???So [search db=][founditems][founditems][unmatched][unmatched][/search]would give more ability than[search db=&unmatched=T][founditems][/founditems][/search]Granted, I don't what kind of performance problemsthe extra loop in the search context could give.Just some thoughts.DonovanScott Anderson wrote:> This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should probably be qualified> by a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] then instead> of a new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [founditems] context to> display the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search attributes and> aggregates could still be applied.>> Thanks for the suggestion.>> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak up'.>>-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)
question: webdelivery folder and file (1997)
TeaRoom Order fields email account remain empty even though thewy are filled. (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
filemaker - orderfile (1997)
tcpconnect feature request .. (2003)
[WebDNA] [middle] << assistance need (2016)
frames & carts (1997)
presetting variables ... (2000)
multiple databases (1997)
Multiple Ad databases? (1997)
range searching (1998)
different browser, different result (2000)
simple answer? [hideif] (1997)
[WebDNA] Problem with [ListDatabases] - WebDNA CE 6.0a - Windows (2010)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
[WebDNA] HTML [sendmail] revisited (2009)
[movefile] create stationery files (1998)
minimalist shopping cart. (1997)
Creating main- and sub-category search (1997)