Re: fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41589
interpreted = N
texte = Hi JohnAfter having searched the mysql documentation I came up with:ORDER BY RAND()which seems to do the trick!Mac OS X 10.1.5 MySQL 3.23.51Just thought I'd let you know.on 15/7/02 6:12 pm, John Peacock at jpeacock@rowman.com wrote:> support_lists@cotsworth.com wrote: >> Does anybody know what the equivalent of fieldnamesdir=ra is when using >> [sql]? >> > > Doesn't exist, AFAIK. If you don't specify a sort order in a SQL query, you > get > whatever order the server feels like returning the records in and you > shouldn't > count on getting them in the same order each time. In most cases, you will > receive the records back in the order they were inserted into the database > (sometimes called natural order), but I wouldn't even count on that being > true. > > John-- Simon Cotsworth Producer/Engineer/Programmer=============================================================== M: 07973 233390 E: simon@cotsworth.com http://simon.cotsworth.com/ =============================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql] (John Peacock 2002)
  2. Re: fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql] (support_lists@cotsworth.com 2002)
  3. Re: fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql] (Gary Krockover 2002)
  4. Re: fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql] (John Peacock 2002)
  5. fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql] (support_lists@cotsworth.com 2002)
Hi JohnAfter having searched the mysql documentation I came up with:ORDER BY RAND()which seems to do the trick!Mac OS X 10.1.5 MySQL 3.23.51Just thought I'd let you know.on 15/7/02 6:12 pm, John Peacock at jpeacock@rowman.com wrote:> support_lists@cotsworth.com wrote: >> Does anybody know what the equivalent of fieldnamesdir=ra is when using >> [SQL]? >> > > Doesn't exist, AFAIK. If you don't specify a sort order in a SQL query, you > get > whatever order the server feels like returning the records in and you > shouldn't > count on getting them in the same order each time. In most cases, you will > receive the records back in the order they were inserted into the database > (sometimes called natural order), but I wouldn't even count on that being > true. > > John-- Simon Cotsworth Producer/Engineer/Programmer=============================================================== M: 07973 233390 E: simon@cotsworth.com http://simon.cotsworth.com/ =============================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ support_lists@cotsworth.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[SHOWIF] (1997) Shipping Calculation Problem (1997) Configuring E-mail (1997) Reversed words (1997) WebMerchant and PCAuthorize (1998) [WebDNA] Happy Valentine's Day! (2012) Alternating colors (1997) New Plug-in and Type 11 errors (1997) Major problem (1999) Two submit buttons ? (1997) New command suggestion (1997) [quantity] solved (1997) A Global Variable (1997) [Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997) searchable list archive (1997) WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997) [WebDNA] Calculate Cube root (2012) [delete] problem (1997) bull, f**k (1998) Encrypt question. (2000)