Re: Developer Resource Center
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43399
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Marc,Check my response to Donovan. I hope that answers your questions for now.Doug-----Original Message----- From: Marc Kaiwi [mailto:marc@restoremustangs.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:46 PM To: WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com Subject: Developer Resource Center I know I'm behind on my list mail but I have to ask about this proposed Developer Resource Center?What exactly is it, and what is a DRC partner? Are there fees associated with this DRC partnership situation, and if so, what about the good folks just looking for an up-to-date information source for the WebDNA products we're all developing with.I guess before I make any more assumptions I should simply ask; Is there any more info on this Developer Resource Center?: c)Thanks,On Friday, September 13, 2002, at 12:03 PM, Donovan wrote:> > > Doug Deck wrote: > >> Donovan, >> >> Thanks for the timely comments. >> >> WebDNA without the developer community is a box of code. Obviously we >> have >> revenue targets to keep in mind, but we know the surest way to achieve >> those >> goals is by developing a tighter partnership with developers. The >> soon-to-be-launched Developer Resource Center (DRC) is designed with >> that >> goal in mind. Tutorials, case studies, white papers, a forum and an >> application showcase where partners can upload examples are all part >> of the >> DRC. Once launched, I'm sure I'll get comments and suggestions for DRC >> improvements. I've noticed many members of the talk list are not shy >> about >> offering comments! :-) > > It's all in the spirit of making a better WebDNA enviro. me thinks. (so > don't take > it personally.) > >> >> >> Smith Micro will continue to offer hosting and consulting services, >> but I >> don't see this as a competitive function. For the most part, our >> engineers >> are focusing on upcoming products. > > good. > >> But working on select high-profile >> projects will help us deliver more appropriate solutions and also >> promotes >> WebDNA recognition. > > No problems here. > >> At the same time, the DRC will showcase our partners >> and their hosting and consulting capabilities. We're here to >> compliment >> rather than compete. > > O.K. > >> >> >> Parallel to establishing the DRC is the lead creation effort. WebDNA + >> developer partners + customers = $$ for all of us. As we step up the >> marketing effort and begin herding opportunities to our door, what >> will we >> do with the leads? The answer is for us to assist in qualifying the >> needs >> and ultimately directing the opportunity to the DRC. > > This is fine but the caveat is that you have to be a paid member to get > the > leads right? > >> If the customer has >> in-house WebDNA talent and is only buying a license, they can do that >> there. >> If they need the services of a WebDNA professional, they will find >> *you* >> there. >> >> You mentioned small writing or condition type of stuff in our new >> direction. Can you help me understand what you are referring to? > > In my understanding there were different levels of participation > depending > on what you opt in for. I think the levels confuse things. > >> I'm not >> interested in making it complicated to do business with Smith Micro. > > Then can you explain in a simple way the new levels? > > (not trying to be rebelious here, but I don't understand your proposed > pay service) > > thanks, > Donovan > >> >> >> Thanks again for the comments! > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > <><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > >Signed: Marc Kaiwi San Diego Motorcycle Club: http://www.sdmotorcycleclub.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi Marc,Check my response to Donovan. I hope that answers your questions for now.Doug-----Original Message----- From: Marc Kaiwi [mailto:marc@restoremustangs.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:46 PM To: WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com Subject: Developer Resource Center I know I'm behind on my list mail but I have to ask about this proposed Developer Resource Center?What exactly is it, and what is a DRC partner? Are there fees associated with this DRC partnership situation, and if so, what about the good folks just looking for an up-to-date information source for the WebDNA products we're all developing with.I guess before I make any more assumptions I should simply ask; Is there any more info on this Developer Resource Center?: c)Thanks,On Friday, September 13, 2002, at 12:03 PM, Donovan wrote:> > > Doug Deck wrote: > >> Donovan, >> >> Thanks for the timely comments. >> >> WebDNA without the developer community is a box of code. Obviously we >> have >> revenue targets to keep in mind, but we know the surest way to achieve >> those >> goals is by developing a tighter partnership with developers. The >> soon-to-be-launched Developer Resource Center (DRC) is designed with >> that >> goal in mind. Tutorials, case studies, white papers, a forum and an >> application showcase where partners can upload examples are all part >> of the >> DRC. Once launched, I'm sure I'll get comments and suggestions for DRC >> improvements. I've noticed many members of the Talk List are not shy >> about >> offering comments! :-) > > It's all in the spirit of making a better WebDNA enviro. me thinks. (so > don't take > it personally.) > >> >> >> Smith Micro will continue to offer hosting and consulting services, >> but I >> don't see this as a competitive function. For the most part, our >> engineers >> are focusing on upcoming products. > > good. > >> But working on select high-profile >> projects will help us deliver more appropriate solutions and also >> promotes >> WebDNA recognition. > > No problems here. > >> At the same time, the DRC will showcase our partners >> and their hosting and consulting capabilities. We're here to >> compliment >> rather than compete. > > O.K. > >> >> >> Parallel to establishing the DRC is the lead creation effort. WebDNA + >> developer partners + customers = $$ for all of us. As we step up the >> marketing effort and begin herding opportunities to our door, what >> will we >> do with the leads? The answer is for us to assist in qualifying the >> needs >> and ultimately directing the opportunity to the DRC. > > This is fine but the caveat is that you have to be a paid member to get > the > leads right? > >> If the customer has >> in-house WebDNA talent and is only buying a license, they can do that >> there. >> If they need the services of a WebDNA professional, they will find >> *you* >> there. >> >> You mentioned small writing or condition type of stuff in our new >> direction. Can you help me understand what you are referring to? > > In my understanding there were different levels of participation > depending > on what you opt in for. I think the levels confuse things. > >> I'm not >> interested in making it complicated to do business with Smith Micro. > > Then can you explain in a simple way the new levels? > > (not trying to be rebelious here, but I don't understand your proposed > pay service) > > thanks, > Donovan > >> >> >> Thanks again for the comments! > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > <><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > >Signed: Marc Kaiwi San Diego Motorcycle Club: http://www.sdmotorcycleclub.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Doug Deck
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Date problems (1997)
Creating comums (1998)
[WebDNA] mail header timezone problem (2008)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Help! WebCat install problems... (2000)
[defined]ish (1997)
Thanks Grant (1997)
Strange intermittent WebDNA problems (2008)
Multiple Admins through users.db (1997)
Emailer help....! (1997)
[TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997)
Coding Style (2000)
Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)
catagories (1997)
WebCatalog stalls (1998)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
referrer variable (1997)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
nslookup (2000)
Directory Overload (1998)