Re: Search bug. Help
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43502
interpreted = N
texte = >> Okay, first of all, you do NOT need the &CTtype=num unless you're >> going to sort the results, or unless you're going to actually perform >> a search that does some kind of greater than or less than >> comparison instead of an equal to or a contains comparison.>Yes I do need to sort >For sake of readability I discarded the ctsort=1. Hi Marc,When you left out the sort parameter I thought you were not sorting the results, and that's why I made my suggestion to remove the field type parameter.For future reference, it's probably a good idea to never discard any portion of your webdna code when seeking help on the list. Sometimes (as in this case) the folks who offer to help you will be able to do a better job if everything (except the extraneous HTML) is there -- in its original form -- so they know exactly what they are dealing with.:) Sincerely, Kenneth Grome--------------------------------------------------- WebDNA Professional Training and Development Center 175 J. Llorente Street +63 (32) 255-6921 Cebu City, Cebu 6000 kengrome@webdna.net Philippines http://www.webdna.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> Okay, first of all, you do NOT need the &CTtype=num unless you're >> going to sort the results, or unless you're going to actually perform >> a search that does some kind of greater than or less than >> comparison instead of an equal to or a contains comparison.>Yes I do need to sort >For sake of readability I discarded the ctsort=1. Hi Marc,When you left out the sort parameter I thought you were not sorting the results, and that's why I made my suggestion to remove the field type parameter.For future reference, it's probably a good idea to never discard any portion of your webdna code when seeking help on the list. Sometimes (as in this case) the folks who offer to help you will be able to do a better job if everything (except the extraneous HTML) is there -- in its original form -- so they know exactly what they are dealing with.:) Sincerely, Kenneth Grome--------------------------------------------------- WebDNA Professional Training and Development Center 175 J. Llorente Street +63 (32) 255-6921 Cebu City, Cebu 6000 kengrome@webdna.net Philippines http://www.webdna.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
select multiple (1997)
PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997)
multiple selected Checkboxes (1998)
Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
RE: Can a database get stomped by simultaneous access? (1997)
Setting up WebCatalog with Retail Pro data (1996)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
WebCat, sudo and ImageMagick (2002)
[REPLACE] inside [FOUNDITEMS] (1998)
[WebDNA] Encryptng a password (2016)
Quick Question About Sorting (1997)
Mystery authentication (1997)
Databases (2000)
Document Contains No Data! (1997)
Using & in subject line (2003)
WebCat Code and WebStar Search? (2000)
bug ? causes NT event log to fill (1997)
One more browser problem to watch out for... (1997)