Re: [include file=filename.inc&strip=t]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43615
interpreted = N
texte = That sounds cool... though it sounds like we'll still need to do some sort of [trim] within the function to avoid stray white space showing up in our resulting pages.Eager with anticipation, BrianAt 3:39 PM 9/19/02, Scott Anderson wrote: >I do not think it is necessary, as the function code does have the ability >to access and create template level variables. So, you can simulate a 'pass >by reference'. Or just make it a part of your definition.... > >[function name=MyFnction] >... >[text scope=global][return]=blah[/text] >[/function] > >[!] Call MyFunction. Result will be stored in the MyResult text variable >[/!] >[Myfunction return=MyResult] > >I think I am giving away to much, I better stop now. > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: WebCatalog Talk >> [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf >> Of Brian Fries >> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:09 PM >> To: WebCatalog Talk >> Subject: Re: [include file=filename.inc&strip=t] >> >> >> Awesome! Then I can stop writing my latest treatise on the benefits >> of such a context! It's always a pleasure to see examples of vendors >> listening to their customers. >> >> Do these functions also have something like a return context so you >> can specify exactly what to return, as opposed to the current >> discussion which is centered around what NOT to return? >> >> i.e.: >> >> [function myFunction] >> code >> more code >> [return [myReturnVar]] >> [/function] >> >> ...and what's the latest on the expected 5.0 release schedule? >> >> - brian >> >> >> At 2:27 PM 9/19/02, Scott Anderson wrote: >> >I see your point. I think it would be good to do both, >> create a global >> >method and a new context, for removing extraneous white space. >> > >> >You will appreciate the new [function name=MyFunction...] >> context I just >> >finished implementing for 5.0. Instances of the 'user >> defined' functions >> >have their own parameter and variable name space. It has >> come in very handy >> >for our 5.0 template development. >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: WebCatalog Talk >> >> [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf >> >> Of John Peacock >> >> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:58 PM >> >> To: WebCatalog Talk >> >> Subject: Re: [include file=filename.inc&strip=t] >> >> >> >> >> >> Scott Anderson wrote: >> >> > One idea that comes to mind is the introduction of a >> >> post-parse action. >> >> > This action could take the form of a WebDNA code block, >> >> which could be >> >> > persisted in the admin prefs. This code block would then >> >> be applied to all >> >> > parsed results, just before being returned to the >> >> webserver. It would then >> >> > be simple matter to define a WebDNA post-parse block of >> >> code to strip out > > >> > EOL's (or whatever), and this would be applied to every > > >> template processed. > > >> > Any feedback? > > >> > > >> No, that would also be nice but would not help me here. My > > >> issue is that the >> >> [include] context contains all of the EOL's from inside the >> >> context in addition >> >> to any text that I explicitely show. I want to have >> >> >> >> [include file=^somefile.inc¶m1] >> >> >> >> appears exactly like a new user-defined function >> >> >> >> [somefile param1] >> >> >> >> with no text (including EOL's) except that which I chose to >> >> display. If the >> >> post-parse action could apply to each enclosing context, that >> >> would be fine. If >> >> you look at what I am trying to accomplish, stripping EOL >> >> before sending would >> >> not be sufficient, since the [include] context is inside >> >> other contexts and the >> >> EOL's could wind up causing a syntax error... >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> -- >> >> John Peacock >> >> Director of Information Research and Technology >> >> Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group >> >> 4720 Boston Way >> >> Lanham, MD 20706 >> >> 301-459-3366 x.5010 > > > > fax 301-429-5747------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
That sounds cool... though it sounds like we'll still need to do some sort of [trim] within the function to avoid stray white space showing up in our resulting pages.Eager with anticipation, BrianAt 3:39 PM 9/19/02, Scott Anderson wrote: >I do not think it is necessary, as the function code does have the ability >to access and create template level variables. So, you can simulate a 'pass >by reference'. Or just make it a part of your definition.... > >[function name=MyFnction] >... >[text scope=global][return]=blah[/text] >[/function] > >[!] Call MyFunction. Result will be stored in the MyResult text variable >[/!] >[Myfunction return=MyResult] > >I think I am giving away to much, I better stop now. > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: WebCatalog Talk >> [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf >> Of Brian Fries >> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:09 PM >> To: WebCatalog Talk >> Subject: Re: [include file=filename.inc&strip=t] >> >> >> Awesome! Then I can stop writing my latest treatise on the benefits >> of such a context! It's always a pleasure to see examples of vendors >> listening to their customers. >> >> Do these functions also have something like a return context so you >> can specify exactly what to return, as opposed to the current >> discussion which is centered around what NOT to return? >> >> i.e.: >> >> [function myFunction] >> code >> more code >> [return [myReturnVar]] >> [/function] >> >> ...and what's the latest on the expected 5.0 release schedule? >> >> - brian >> >> >> At 2:27 PM 9/19/02, Scott Anderson wrote: >> >I see your point. I think it would be good to do both, >> create a global >> >method and a new context, for removing extraneous white space. >> > >> >You will appreciate the new [function name=MyFunction...] >> context I just >> >finished implementing for 5.0. Instances of the 'user >> defined' functions >> >have their own parameter and variable name space. It has >> come in very handy >> >for our 5.0 template development. >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: WebCatalog Talk >> >> [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf >> >> Of John Peacock >> >> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:58 PM >> >> To: WebCatalog Talk >> >> Subject: Re: [include file=filename.inc&strip=t] >> >> >> >> >> >> Scott Anderson wrote: >> >> > One idea that comes to mind is the introduction of a >> >> post-parse action. >> >> > This action could take the form of a WebDNA code block, >> >> which could be >> >> > persisted in the admin prefs. This code block would then >> >> be applied to all >> >> > parsed results, just before being returned to the >> >> webserver. It would then >> >> > be simple matter to define a WebDNA post-parse block of >> >> code to strip out > > >> > EOL's (or whatever), and this would be applied to every > > >> template processed. > > >> > Any feedback? > > >> > > >> No, that would also be nice but would not help me here. My > > >> issue is that the >> >> [include] context contains all of the EOL's from inside the >> >> context in addition >> >> to any text that I explicitely show. I want to have >> >> >> >> [include file=^somefile.inc¶m1] >> >> >> >> appears exactly like a new user-defined function >> >> >> >> [somefile param1] >> >> >> >> with no text (including EOL's) except that which I chose to >> >> display. If the >> >> post-parse action could apply to each enclosing context, that >> >> would be fine. If >> >> you look at what I am trying to accomplish, stripping EOL >> >> before sending would >> >> not be sufficient, since the [include] context is inside >> >> other contexts and the >> >> EOL's could wind up causing a syntax error... >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> -- >> >> John Peacock >> >> Director of Information Research and Technology >> >> Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group >> >> 4720 Boston Way >> >> Lanham, MD 20706 >> >> 301-459-3366 x.5010 > > > > fax 301-429-5747------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
NetSplat and WebCat2 (1997)
ReturnRaw Returns (2000)
Sub Categories (2000)
[spawn] and [formvariables] (1999)
Using [Showif] tag. Mac (1997)
WebCatalog as a ListServ (1998)
PIXO support (1997)
catching WebDNA error messages (2003)
[WebDNA] SHA-256 (2015)
Sendmail Excel attachment (2003)
Different Email recipients? (1998)
Date conversion (2002)
Date Formats (1997)
Close-to Comparison Code (1998)
Late on Friday.... brain fried (2002)
WebCat hosting providers? - one more option (1997)
2.0 Beta (1997)
WebCat2 - [include] tags (1997)
Fun with Dates - any progress? (1997)
For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997)