Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45043
interpreted = N
texte = >I'm not sure you'll find a volunteer for a server here if submissions are >loaded via the web anonymously - I don't mind if it's anonymous but I want >to know who wrote code and I want to check it before it runs on my server.Then the server host should be excluded from the voting -- but SMSI should definitely be disqualified from voting or having anything whatsoever to do with the outcome of the contest. The winners should be OUR decision, not SMSI's. It's not their contest. >I think judges that are our 'peers' would be good.Me too, that's why I suggested it ... :) >Perhaps we could combine >the two - weight it 50% voting, 50% SMSI .. >Any other ideas out thereI think all of us could vote -- except SMSI, and except the server host who will be checking the submitted code and therefore will know where it comes from. Sincerely, Kenneth Grome--------------------------------------------------- WebDNA Professional Training and Development Center 175 J. Llorente Street +63 (32) 255-6921 Cebu City, Cebu 6000 kengrome@webdna.net Philippines http://www.webdna.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>I'm not sure you'll find a volunteer for a server here if submissions are >loaded via the web anonymously - I don't mind if it's anonymous but I want >to know who wrote code and I want to check it before it runs on my server.Then the server host should be excluded from the voting -- but SMSI should definitely be disqualified from voting or having anything whatsoever to do with the outcome of the contest. The winners should be OUR decision, not SMSI's. It's not their contest. >I think judges that are our 'peers' would be good.Me too, that's why I suggested it ... :) >Perhaps we could combine >the two - weight it 50% voting, 50% SMSI .. >Any other ideas out thereI think all of us could vote -- except SMSI, and except the server host who will be checking the submitted code and therefore will know where it comes from. Sincerely, Kenneth Grome--------------------------------------------------- WebDNA Professional Training and Development Center 175 J. Llorente Street +63 (32) 255-6921 Cebu City, Cebu 6000 kengrome@webdna.net Philippines http://www.webdna.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
setlineiems and UnitShip Cost (2000)
This is probably a stupid question... (2004)
Re:Help name our technology! (1997)
Part Html part WebDNA (1997)
StandardConversions.db (1998)
Can [writefile] files be served thru webcat? (2000)
[WebDNA] General email error -1 (WebDNA 7) (2012)
Credit card types (1997)
Keyword search (2004)
Forms Search Questions (1997)
input problem (1999)
Server capacity (2003)
Listfiles path bug ... (2005)
WebCat2.0 acgi vs plugin (1997)
CyberSource (2005)
Understanding texta (1997)
WebCatalog on LinuxPPC (2000)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Unexpected error (1997)
Nesting WebDNA in JavaScript (2003)