Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45055
interpreted = N
texte = Brian Boegershausen wrote:>I like this idea, but the one problem I see is.. encryption. >Over the past few weeks I have been coding here and there building a >database import system that will allow a user to upload and import a >database into any existing database in a designated folder. >This would definately be my entry, > Brian, I tend to like the idea that this be new code started from now on.... not libraried code (minus snippets). If I remember right the thread started off with more of an effort towards widgets that are not necessarilly functional but rather flashy? Anyway, I think we need to figure out these things:1.)Will we allow other languages? (java, flash etc..) (my vote is either no or put them into a allow other languages category and vote separately for them.)2.)Who will host the two servers? (see below ;-) and how will we remain annonymous? I think this could be done with a submition system that the hoster can approve before it goes live to protect against taking down a machine.3.) code limitations such as Andrew and Alain suggested.4.) deadline.5.) voting system that protects against multiple votes by a single person. (a widget in itself)6.) uh idunno> >Maybe users could just upload their name and email which would remain >private until a winner is found, then put a link to their script which is on >their own server. This way no one has to worry about having users upload >potentially harmful code to their server. > The problem with this is that machines produce varying levels of performance. I think we need to have two servers doing this. One in the US and one in Europe or something. This way we would have a better grip on the performance variables between machines. If I have time, I'll play.Donovan> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Frank Nordberg 2002)
  2. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  3. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  4. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  5. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Alain Russell 2002)
  6. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Bob Minor 2002)
  7. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  8. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  9. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Brian Boegershausen 2002)
  10. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Alain Russell 2002)
  11. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  12. WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Alain Russell 2002)
Brian Boegershausen wrote:>I like this idea, but the one problem I see is.. encryption. >Over the past few weeks I have been coding here and there building a >database import system that will allow a user to upload and import a >database into any existing database in a designated folder. >This would definately be my entry, > Brian, I tend to like the idea that this be new code started from now on.... not libraried code (minus snippets). If I remember right the thread started off with more of an effort towards widgets that are not necessarilly functional but rather flashy? Anyway, I think we need to figure out these things:1.)Will we allow other languages? (java, flash etc..) (my vote is either no or put them into a allow other languages category and vote separately for them.)2.)Who will host the two servers? (see below ;-) and how will we remain annonymous? I think this could be done with a submition system that the hoster can approve before it goes live to protect against taking down a machine.3.) code limitations such as Andrew and Alain suggested.4.) deadline.5.) voting system that protects against multiple votes by a single person. (a widget in itself)6.) uh idunno> >Maybe users could just upload their name and email which would remain >private until a winner is found, then put a link to their script which is on >their own server. This way no one has to worry about having users upload >potentially harmful code to their server. > The problem with this is that machines produce varying levels of performance. I think we need to have two servers doing this. One in the US and one in Europe or something. This way we would have a better grip on the performance variables between machines. If I have time, I'll play.Donovan> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

How to display images? (2002) form variables (2000) Error: this shopping cart has already been submitted and (2006) MasterCounter Weirdness -Resolved! (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) Whats going on with my SERIAL NUMBER??? (1998) question: search return in order (1997) Line Feed problems ... (2002) NetSplat and WebCat2 (1997) Part Html part WebDNA (1997) NT beta ReadMe missing (b12-b15) (1997) Searching for a Blank Field (2000) WebCat 4 / 4.5 License for sale! (2003) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) [shownext max=?] armed (1997) WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (2002) One other big addition... (1997) special commerce fields (1997) UPDATE PROBLEM (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA install on Redhat 4 64 bit? (2008)