Re: Forumulas.db & Variables
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45888
interpreted = N
texte = Gary Krockover wrote:> In your formulas.db? I've never had taxable=T in my formulas.db but I do > have it in the product database. What's the advantage of having it in the > formulas.db aside from the fact that you only have to enter the one line of > code versus putting a T in the taxable field for all products that are > taxable?This is for if all your items are taxable... you don't have to append every record in the products.db with a taxable value.> > Also, would it be a disadvantage to having it in the formulas.db if some > products were taxable and some were not? I would think so?Yes, you wouldn't want to specify all your products as taxable if they were not.Donovan> > > GK > > | On 12/2/02 11:09 AM, Donovan
wrote: > | > | > Did you have a TaxableT in your formulas.db? > | > | Yes-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Gary Krockover wrote:> In your formulas.db? I've never had taxable=T in my formulas.db but I do > have it in the product database. What's the advantage of having it in the > formulas.db aside from the fact that you only have to enter the one line of > code versus putting a T in the taxable field for all products that are > taxable?This is for if all your items are taxable... you don't have to append every record in the products.db with a taxable value.> > Also, would it be a disadvantage to having it in the formulas.db if some > products were taxable and some were not? I would think so?Yes, you wouldn't want to specify all your products as taxable if they were not.Donovan> > > GK > > | On 12/2/02 11:09 AM, Donovan wrote: > | > | > Did you have a TaxableT in your formulas.db? > | > | Yes-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WC2b15 File Corruption (1997)
[WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (2011)
09:45:00 -> 9.75 (2001)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996)
Date Formats (1997)
shipcost and Formulas.db (2000)
Botched cart numbers in webmerchant 2.1x email with webcat 3 (1998)
authenticating a second user (1997)
[WebDNA] 301 redirect (2016)
includes and cart numbers (1997)
searching with groups (1997)
File upload woes (1998)
method of payment (1997)
WebCatalog as a ListServ (1998)
Practice runs ? (1997)
For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997)
California Tax Rates (1998)
Plugin or CGI or both (1997)
encrypt/decrypt - are docs correct?? (2002)