Re: OT : Site speed feedback

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45999
interpreted = N
texte = http://www.novaderm.comYeah, I got about 40 seconds after I dumped the cache.Good observation...-WillOn Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 09:12 AM, Donovan wrote:> > > WJ Starck wrote: > >> The site took 1 1/2 minutes to load on a dogass slow 56K dialup >> connection that only gets 24K throughput (thanks Verizon!). That might >> translate into 30 seconds on a 56 K dialup, which is what you should >> be >> coding for. I checked our site on the same dialup, and it took 12 >> seconds to load. > > One thing to note here Will, Almost always there will be a huge speed > improvement > by browswers once they've visited a site once because of caching, > unless > its been turned off and even then there could be other caches. > > I suspect that you are getting a faster response from your site because > you've visited it before. What is your site address? I'll swing by > for a check. > > Donovan > >> >> >> IMHO, the site is too graphics heavy. You might see if you can >> eliminate some of the graphics on the sidebars. Pages that take too >> long to load = lost customers! >> >> ;) >> >> -Will Starck >> NovaDerm Skincare Science >> http://www.novaderm.com >> wjs@novaderm.com >> 800-378-1740 >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Steve Craig 2002)
  2. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Bob Minor 2002)
  3. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Mark Derrick 2002)
  4. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Alain Russell 2002)
  5. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Alan White 2002)
  6. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  7. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Alan White 2002)
  8. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (stuff 2002)
  9. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Alex McCombie 2002)
  10. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Donovan 2002)
  11. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (WJ Starck 2002)
  12. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Donovan 2002)
  13. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Mark Derrick 2002)
  14. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (WJ Starck 2002)
  15. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Donovan 2002)
  16. Re: OT : Site speed feedback (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2002)
  17. OT : Site speed feedback (Alan White 2002)
http://www.novaderm.comYeah, I got about 40 seconds after I dumped the cache.Good observation...-WillOn Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 09:12 AM, Donovan wrote:> > > WJ Starck wrote: > >> The site took 1 1/2 minutes to load on a dogass slow 56K dialup >> connection that only gets 24K throughput (thanks Verizon!). That might >> translate into 30 seconds on a 56 K dialup, which is what you should >> be >> coding for. I checked our site on the same dialup, and it took 12 >> seconds to load. > > One thing to note here Will, Almost always there will be a huge speed > improvement > by browswers once they've visited a site once because of caching, > unless > its been turned off and even then there could be other caches. > > I suspect that you are getting a faster response from your site because > you've visited it before. What is your site address? I'll swing by > for a check. > > Donovan > >> >> >> IMHO, the site is too graphics heavy. You might see if you can >> eliminate some of the graphics on the sidebars. Pages that take too >> long to load = lost customers! >> >> ;) >> >> -Will Starck >> NovaDerm Skincare Science >> http://www.novaderm.com >> wjs@novaderm.com >> 800-378-1740 >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ WJ Starck

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Condensing the CART numeric sequence (2002) unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997) Blank orders after update to 5.1 (2003) [OT] XML Primer (2004) Rename folder under WC3 (2000) Database flushing does not work any more... (2000) Caching pages...again (2001) [WebDNA] behavior of [thisurl] in the context of 'mod_rewrite' (2012) [HIDEIF] inside [FOUNDITEM] (1997) [item] appears after 'remove last item' ... (1997) Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997) Ooops..Broswer Info.txt (was Web*SSL and WebCatalog) (1997) Emailer setup (1997) email code (1998) Same DB Same Time (2004) RE: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) using WebCat for Associate Programs? (1998) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) Error Page? (1997)