Re: Unexpected comparison behavior change in 4.5.1
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48765
interpreted = N
texte = Brian is quite correct, as far as I can see.VelmaAt 12:21 PM 3/18/2003, you wrote:>Brian,>>That is not correct.>>bob is a string consisting of the letters 'bob' it DOES contain 'b' (which >is what the ^ means to WebDNA) it does not contain '' which is what >[showif bob^] means as well as [if bob^]. Both these statements are FALSE.>>Someone correct me if I'm wrong please :)>>- Charles>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>Your description is inconclusive. If I was checking for b, then, to >>paraphrase you:>>>>What your comparison is saying IF bob contains b then true. bob contains >>bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>This is not a test for equality, and bob contains NOTHING an infinite >>number of times.>>>>Again, I'm not saying that one result is better than the other - >>logically it's an inconclusive test. What I am saying is that, since it's >>inconclusive, it SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CHANGED WITHOUT GOOD REASON AND >>WITHOUT NOTIFYING DEVELOPERS THAT THEIR CODE MIGHT BREAK.>>>>SMSI: Comments? Scott? Please?>>>>- brian>>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>What your comparison is saying IF bob contains NOTHING then true. bob >>>contains bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:38 PM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:32 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>[showif bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>or>>>>>>>>>>>>[if bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In my tests, these evaluate to true under 4.5.0 and earlier, and to >>>>>>false under 4.5.1. Clearly URL is not the issue here.>>>>>[showif bob^] should evaluate to 'false' so it seems the bug was in 4.5.0>>>>>>>>And WHY should [showif bob^] evaluate false? I don't see anything in >>>>the empty string that isn't also in bob, therefore I - and every >>>>version of WebDNA prior to 4.5.1 - would expect it to evaluate to > true.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[if bob^] should evaluate to 'false' as well.>>>>>>>>Again, why is false any better than true for this? If WebDNA were >>>>being written from scratch, then it would be the right time to make a >>>>choice on this. But, since it's worked the same way since I began using >>>>the product in 1997, I think its a little late to make this change.>>>>>>>>I'm not really here to debate which way it SHOULD resolve the >>>>comparison, I'm only here to point out that it broke my code - which >>>>was fully tested and had been working fine for years.>>>>>>>>>It was always my understanding that when using [if] to compare >>>>>strings, they needed to be in quotes. Was in the docs. as that from >>>>>the beginning.>>>>>>>>Relevance? What quotes do you see missing from my example?>>>>>>>>- brian>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------->>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list
.>>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>>>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>------------------------------------------------------------->This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/----------------------------------------Velma KahnGlory Day Software Company200 Tanager Ln NW, Floyd, Virginia 24091, U.S.A.phone: 540-745-6469 * fax: 651-321-4884email: vkahn@glorydaysoftware.comhttp://www.glorydaysoftware.comhttp://www.communitymade.comhttp://www.floydcrafts.com-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Brian is quite correct, as far as I can see.VelmaAt 12:21 PM 3/18/2003, you wrote:>Brian,>>That is not correct.>>bob is a string consisting of the letters 'bob' it DOES contain 'b' (which >is what the ^ means to WebDNA) it does not contain '' which is what >[showif bob^] means as well as [if bob^]. Both these statements are FALSE.>>Someone correct me if I'm wrong please :)>>- Charles>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>Your description is inconclusive. If I was checking for b, then, to >>paraphrase you:>>>>What your comparison is saying IF bob contains b then true. bob contains >>bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>This is not a test for equality, and bob contains NOTHING an infinite >>number of times.>>>>Again, I'm not saying that one result is better than the other - >>logically it's an inconclusive test. What I am saying is that, since it's >>inconclusive, it SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CHANGED WITHOUT GOOD REASON AND >>WITHOUT NOTIFYING DEVELOPERS THAT THEIR CODE MIGHT BREAK.>>>>SMSI: Comments? Scott? Please?>>>>- brian>>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>What your comparison is saying IF bob contains NOTHING then true. bob >>>contains bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:38 PM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:32 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>[showif bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>or>>>>>>>>>>>>[if bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In my tests, these evaluate to true under 4.5.0 and earlier, and to >>>>>>false under 4.5.1. Clearly URL is not the issue here.>>>>>[showif bob^] should evaluate to 'false' so it seems the bug was in 4.5.0>>>>>>>>And WHY should [showif bob^] evaluate false? I don't see anything in >>>>the empty string that isn't also in bob, therefore I - and every >>>>version of WebDNA prior to 4.5.1 - would expect it to evaluate to > true.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[if bob^] should evaluate to 'false' as well.>>>>>>>>Again, why is false any better than true for this? If WebDNA were >>>>being written from scratch, then it would be the right time to make a >>>>choice on this. But, since it's worked the same way since I began using >>>>the product in 1997, I think its a little late to make this change.>>>>>>>>I'm not really here to debate which way it SHOULD resolve the >>>>comparison, I'm only here to point out that it broke my code - which >>>>was fully tested and had been working fine for years.>>>>>>>>>It was always my understanding that when using [if] to compare >>>>>strings, they needed to be in quotes. Was in the docs. as that from >>>>>the beginning.>>>>>>>>Relevance? What quotes do you see missing from my example?>>>>>>>>- brian>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------->>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>>>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>------------------------------------------------------------->This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/----------------------------------------Velma KahnGlory Day Software Company200 Tanager Ln NW, Floyd, Virginia 24091, U.S.A.phone: 540-745-6469 * fax: 651-321-4884email: vkahn@glorydaysoftware.comhttp://www.glorydaysoftware.comhttp://www.communitymade.comhttp://www.floydcrafts.com-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Velma Kahn
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Including a php script (2003)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
textarea (2000)
[sendmail] bug? (2000)
[WebDNA] WARNING Do not upgrade to OS X Server 5.04 (2015)
OT - SMSI complaint (2001)
Major problem (1999)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
and vs or vs not (1998)
Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997)
Shop till you drop dead on the avenue ... (1997)
Banners (1997)
RE: groups and [ShowNext] (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997)
[username],[password] for [authenticate] (2001)
secret [cmd] variable? (2004)
boldwords funky (1998)
New WebCatalog site! (1997)