Re: Unexpected comparison behavior change in 4.5.1
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48766
interpreted = N
texte = explain.- ckOn Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:25 PM, Velma Kahn wrote:> Brian is quite correct, as far as I can see.> Velma>>> At 12:21 PM 3/18/2003, you wrote:>> Brian,>>>> That is not correct.>>>> bob is a string consisting of the letters 'bob' it DOES contain 'b' >> (which is what the ^ means to WebDNA) it does not contain '' which is >> what [showif bob^] means as well as [if bob^]. Both these >> statements are FALSE.>>>> Someone correct me if I'm wrong please :)>>>> - Charles>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>> Your description is inconclusive. If I was checking for b, then, >>> to paraphrase you:>>>>>> What your comparison is saying IF bob contains b then true. bob >>> contains bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>>> This is not a test for equality, and bob contains NOTHING an >>> infinite number of times.>>>>>> Again, I'm not saying that one result is better than the other - >>> logically it's an inconclusive test. What I am saying is that, since >>> it's inconclusive, it SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CHANGED WITHOUT GOOD >>> REASON AND WITHOUT NOTIFYING DEVELOPERS THAT THEIR CODE MIGHT BREAK.>>>>>> SMSI: Comments? Scott? Please?>>>>>> - brian>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>>> What your comparison is saying IF bob contains NOTHING then true. >>>> bob contains bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:38 PM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:32 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> [showif bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [if bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my tests, these evaluate to true under 4.5.0 and earlier, >>>>>>> and to false under 4.5.1. Clearly URL is not the issue here.>>>>>> [showif bob^] should evaluate to 'false' so it seems the bug was >>>>>> in 4.5.0>>>>>>>>>> And WHY should [showif bob^] evaluate false? I don't see anything >>>>> in the empty string that isn't also in bob, therefore I - and >>>>> every version of WebDNA prior to 4.5.1 - would expect it to >>>>> evaluate to > true.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [if bob^] should evaluate to 'false' as well.>>>>>>>>>> Again, why is false any better than true for this? If WebDNA >>>>> were being written from scratch, then it would be the right time >>>>> to make a choice on this. But, since it's worked the same way >>>>> since I began using the product in 1997, I think its a little late >>>>> to make this change.>>>>>>>>>> I'm not really here to debate which way it SHOULD resolve the >>>>> comparison, I'm only here to point out that it broke my code - >>>>> which was fully tested and had been working fine for years.>>>>>>>>>>> It was always my understanding that when using [if] to compare >>>>>> strings, they needed to be in quotes. Was in the docs. as that >>>>>> from the beginning.>>>>>>>>>> Relevance? What quotes do you see missing from my example?>>>>>>>>>> - brian>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list
.>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>> >>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> ----------------------------------------> Velma Kahn> Glory Day Software Company> 200 Tanager Ln NW, Floyd, Virginia 24091, U.S.A.> phone: 540-745-6469 * fax: 651-321-4884> email: vkahn@glorydaysoftware.com> http://www.glorydaysoftware.com> http://www.communitymade.com> http://www.floydcrafts.com>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
explain.- ckOn Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:25 PM, Velma Kahn wrote:> Brian is quite correct, as far as I can see.> Velma>>> At 12:21 PM 3/18/2003, you wrote:>> Brian,>>>> That is not correct.>>>> bob is a string consisting of the letters 'bob' it DOES contain 'b' >> (which is what the ^ means to WebDNA) it does not contain '' which is >> what [showif bob^] means as well as [if bob^]. Both these >> statements are FALSE.>>>> Someone correct me if I'm wrong please :)>>>> - Charles>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>> Your description is inconclusive. If I was checking for b, then, >>> to paraphrase you:>>>>>> What your comparison is saying IF bob contains b then true. bob >>> contains bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>>> This is not a test for equality, and bob contains NOTHING an >>> infinite number of times.>>>>>> Again, I'm not saying that one result is better than the other - >>> logically it's an inconclusive test. What I am saying is that, since >>> it's inconclusive, it SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CHANGED WITHOUT GOOD >>> REASON AND WITHOUT NOTIFYING DEVELOPERS THAT THEIR CODE MIGHT BREAK.>>>>>> SMSI: Comments? Scott? Please?>>>>>> - brian>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>>> What your comparison is saying IF bob contains NOTHING then true. >>>> bob contains bob therefore is false in both cases.>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:38 PM, Charles Kline wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:32 AM, Brian Fries wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> [showif bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [if bob^]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my tests, these evaluate to true under 4.5.0 and earlier, >>>>>>> and to false under 4.5.1. Clearly URL is not the issue here.>>>>>> [showif bob^] should evaluate to 'false' so it seems the bug was >>>>>> in 4.5.0>>>>>>>>>> And WHY should [showif bob^] evaluate false? I don't see anything >>>>> in the empty string that isn't also in bob, therefore I - and >>>>> every version of WebDNA prior to 4.5.1 - would expect it to >>>>> evaluate to > true.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [if bob^] should evaluate to 'false' as well.>>>>>>>>>> Again, why is false any better than true for this? If WebDNA >>>>> were being written from scratch, then it would be the right time >>>>> to make a choice on this. But, since it's worked the same way >>>>> since I began using the product in 1997, I think its a little late >>>>> to make this change.>>>>>>>>>> I'm not really here to debate which way it SHOULD resolve the >>>>> comparison, I'm only here to point out that it broke my code - >>>>> which was fully tested and had been working fine for years.>>>>>>>>>>> It was always my understanding that when using [if] to compare >>>>>> strings, they needed to be in quotes. Was in the docs. as that >>>>>> from the beginning.>>>>>>>>>> Relevance? What quotes do you see missing from my example?>>>>>>>>>> - brian>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>> >>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> ----------------------------------------> Velma Kahn> Glory Day Software Company> 200 Tanager Ln NW, Floyd, Virginia 24091, U.S.A.> phone: 540-745-6469 * fax: 651-321-4884> email: vkahn@glorydaysoftware.com> http://www.glorydaysoftware.com> http://www.communitymade.com> http://www.floydcrafts.com>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Charles Kline
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
Strange database format import (2000)
[WebDNA] can webdna's [grep] find and replace ONLY the literal "+" char? (2012)
Who is doing sign-ups-got it (1998)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
WebCat2 - [SendNews] (1997)
Late on Friday.... brain fried (2002)
is your webDNA site 'froogle' ready ??? (2003)
emailer (1997)
re: emailer prob (1998)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Quitting WebMerchant ? (1997)
Showif (2000)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
DON'T use old cart file! (1997)
Intermitent problem using [referrer] (1997)
Another issue with [Date format] (1998)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)
Multiple prices (1997)
Talk List Suggestions (1997)