Re: PayFlow Pro - Changing the Amount that was Authorized
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49288
interpreted = N
texte = Ha! I agree with you on the comment regarding Verisign's support.Yes, I've checked and as far as I can tell, this info is being passed tothem. For some reason, they're telling me that they're not receiving theAMT field now. But I can see that it's being sent to them. Ugh... I'lljust keep plugging away with their tech support department...hoping to comeacross someone who was hired based on their experience rather than favoritecolor. ;-)Thanks for your help!Tana-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf OfDonovanSent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:27 AMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: PayFlow Pro - Changing the Amount that was AuthorizedTana Adams wrote:>Thanks so much for responding, Sal. It's funny, several representatives>from Verisign have assured me that this can be done.>In the Developers Guide it says:Capturing Transactions for Lower AmountsYou can capture an authorized transaction for an amount lower than theoriginalauthorization amount. To do this, issue a delayed capture and specifythe loweramount.pfpro test-payflow.verisign.com 443TRXTYPE=D&TENDER=C&PWD=password&PARTNER=partnerID orVerisign&VENDOR=login&USER=login&ORIGID=VXYZ00887892=10.42(then it goes on telling how to capture higher amounts)Though I can't deny that things are getting better at Verisign, It seemsthatthere are not strict requirements to be a phone support person....oh, your favorite color is blue? You are perfect for the job!On this topic, Is there any plans to update documentation / code onWebDNA, relatedto Pay Flo Pro's different payment methods ... Delayed Capture, checksetc..??This and an worked over WebMerchant / Store(s)Builder would really helpmaintain the entrepeneur market.Donovan> But it's been very>vague as to how to get it to work properly.>>I bet you're right about the transaction fee -- they probably can do it>alright but don't want to make it easy so they can charge the fee again.>>---Donovan Brooke-Administrator of IT /-Assc. Art Director-Creative Services-Epsen Hillmer Graphics-402.829.0123-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail toWeb Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Ha! I agree with you on the comment regarding Verisign's support.Yes, I've checked and as far as I can tell, this info is being passed tothem. For some reason, they're telling me that they're not receiving theAMT field now. But I can see that it's being sent to them. Ugh... I'lljust keep plugging away with their tech support department...hoping to comeacross someone who was hired based on their experience rather than favoritecolor. ;-)Thanks for your help!Tana-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf OfDonovanSent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:27 AMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: PayFlow Pro - Changing the Amount that was AuthorizedTana Adams wrote:>Thanks so much for responding, Sal. It's funny, several representatives>from Verisign have assured me that this can be done.>In the Developers Guide it says:Capturing Transactions for Lower AmountsYou can capture an authorized transaction for an amount lower than theoriginalauthorization amount. To do this, issue a delayed capture and specifythe loweramount.pfpro test-payflow.verisign.com 443TRXTYPE=D&TENDER=C&PWD=password&PARTNER=partnerID orVerisign&VENDOR=login&USER=login&ORIGID=VXYZ00887892=10.42(then it goes on telling how to capture higher amounts)Though I can't deny that things are getting better at Verisign, It seemsthatthere are not strict requirements to be a phone support person....oh, your favorite color is blue? You are perfect for the job!On this topic, Is there any plans to update documentation / code onWebDNA, relatedto Pay Flo Pro's different payment methods ... Delayed Capture, checksetc..??This and an worked over WebMerchant / Store(s)Builder would really helpmaintain the entrepeneur market.Donovan> But it's been very>vague as to how to get it to work properly.>>I bet you're right about the transaction fee -- they probably can do it>alright but don't want to make it easy so they can charge the fee again.>>---Donovan Brooke-Administrator of IT /-Assc. Art Director-Creative Services-Epsen Hillmer Graphics-402.829.0123-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail toWeb Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Tana
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
includes and cart numbers (1997)
RE: Webcat 2.0.1b1 bug with IE 3.01/4.0p1 (1997)
Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997)
[WebDNA] SiteBuilder Calendar (2008)
Need Web Cat Hosting ASAP (2000)
Shopping Cart Questions (1998)
Document Contains No Data! (1997)
Questions To Answer (1997)
WebCat2_Mac RETURNs in .db (1997)
How To get Some Help (2003)
[math] are you there? (1999)
Banner not random (1999)
File Upload (1997)
SendMail on OS X (2003)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
What am I missing (1997)
Next X hits (1996)
Nesting format tags (1997)
can WC render sites out? (1997)
Is [thisurl] http or https? (1998)