Re: Interactive Online Docs Was: [OT] Mozilla | Was: R.I.P.
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 51970
interpreted = N
texte = While we're at the docs, how about a SEARCH form? You know, search for a key word or two and return a results page linking to all the docs pages that contain the terms? This is a database system, after all...- brianOn Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 06:59 AM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:>> We are listening, and I'll talk with Doug about changing this ...>> Phil B.>> -----Original Message-----> From: Gary Krockover [mailto:gary@garykrockover.com]> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:01 PM> To: WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com> Subject: Re: Interactive Online Docs Was: [OT] Mozilla | Was: R.I.P.> Netscape>> Hopefully SMSI is monitoring the boards and will tone down the graphic > on> the interactive online docs. I like the old layout as well, if they > would> incorporate the note annotation feature with that version it would get > more> use I'm guessing.>> Thanks,> GK>> ----- Original Message ----->> Hi Gary,>>>> For me, it's the header also that keeps me from using the interactive>> docs--it takes us about half my screen. The old docs aren't >> pretty--but I>> see literally twice as much. The old two frame sidebar setup isn't >> elegant>> either--but it sure works well and stays out of the way. I know the>> commentary will become more of a draw as there's more of it. I do >> have a>> request there--add a "none yet" or something--it took me a while to >> figure>> out that if there is something it will show, and I kept opening that> window>> to see...>>>> Best regards,>> Velma>>>> At 01:04 PM 7/24/2003, you wrote:>>> I knew you were going to say "a way to edit typo's">>>>>> :)>>>>>> I'll see what I can work up for them. I agree on the header graphic >>> as>>> well.>>>>>> GK>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list
.> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
While we're at the docs, how about a SEARCH form? You know, search for a key word or two and return a results page linking to all the docs pages that contain the terms? This is a database system, after all...- brianOn Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 06:59 AM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:>> We are listening, and I'll talk with Doug about changing this ...>> Phil B.>> -----Original Message-----> From: Gary Krockover [mailto:gary@garykrockover.com]> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:01 PM> To: WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com> Subject: Re: Interactive Online Docs Was: [OT] Mozilla | Was: R.I.P.> Netscape>> Hopefully SMSI is monitoring the boards and will tone down the graphic > on> the interactive online docs. I like the old layout as well, if they > would> incorporate the note annotation feature with that version it would get > more> use I'm guessing.>> Thanks,> GK>> ----- Original Message ----->> Hi Gary,>>>> For me, it's the header also that keeps me from using the interactive>> docs--it takes us about half my screen. The old docs aren't >> pretty--but I>> see literally twice as much. The old two frame sidebar setup isn't >> elegant>> either--but it sure works well and stays out of the way. I know the>> commentary will become more of a draw as there's more of it. I do >> have a>> request there--add a "none yet" or something--it took me a while to >> figure>> out that if there is something it will show, and I kept opening that> window>> to see...>>>> Best regards,>> Velma>>>> At 01:04 PM 7/24/2003, you wrote:>>> I knew you were going to say "a way to edit typo's">>>>>> :)>>>>>> I'll see what I can work up for them. I agree on the header graphic >>> as>>> well.>>>>>> GK>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997)
Rendering out a page (1997)
re: Large databases in WebCat (1997)
docs for WebCatalog2 (1997)
Setting vars in a text file..... (2004)
cookie length (1998)
ConvertChars (1998)
[OT] Industry standard for missing orders (2003)
This Code Kills My WebCatalog Dead (2003)
[WebDNA] Where is Speed Test? (2009)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)
email problem (1998)
Problems appending to database (1997)
WebSTAR 2.1 freezes my Mac (1997)
Database Advice (1996)
Grep -- remove extra returns first (2003)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
bug in [SendMail] (1997)
Server problem? (1998)