Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 52128
interpreted = N
texte = Kenneth, Thanks. I just tried a slimmed down search with no sort specified... [search db=db/messages.db&nemsg_iddatarq=[blank]&msg_idsumm=T&max=10] [founditems] .... [/founditems] [/search] What you are saying, is that this would list the [msg_id] at the top that had the most matches? It didn't. this search seemed to randomly, pick out 10 results. I could not find a pattern to the sort at all. It just grabbed 10 of them out of seemingly anywhere in the db., of those the highest number was 10 matches. I know that one [msg_id] in particular has over 200 posts, and there are many that have more than 10. I thought that the default sort was "best match" not "most matches" In otherwords the results that "best match" the search criteria, not the results that have the most matches...? -- Confused. On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> I was hoping to get a clearer understanding of the possibility of >> sorting a search by entries that have the most number of matches >> first. > > > WebDNA automatically sorts by placing the records with the most > matches at the top of the founditems list. If you use sort parameters > you will override this automatic ranking of the entire founditems > list, but ranking will still occur within the groups you are sorting > by -- unless you put "&allhit=1" into your search parameters which > will effectively turn off all automatic ranking. > > -- > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less! > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Alain Russell 2003)
  2. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Glenn Busbin 2003)
  3. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Robert Wade 2003)
  4. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Glenn Busbin 2003)
  5. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Robert Wade 2003)
  6. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Robert Wade 2003)
  8. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( "WebDna @" 2003)
  9. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Robert Wade 2003)
  10. Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  11. Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field ( Robert Wade 2003)
Kenneth, Thanks. I just tried a slimmed down search with no sort specified... [search db=db/messages.db&nemsg_iddatarq=[blank]&msg_idsumm=T&max=10] [founditems] .... [/founditems] [/search] What you are saying, is that this would list the [msg_id] at the top that had the most matches? It didn't. this search seemed to randomly, pick out 10 results. I could not find a pattern to the sort at all. It just grabbed 10 of them out of seemingly anywhere in the db., of those the highest number was 10 matches. I know that one [msg_id] in particular has over 200 posts, and there are many that have more than 10. I thought that the default sort was "best match" not "most matches" In otherwords the results that "best match" the search criteria, not the results that have the most matches...? -- Confused. On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> I was hoping to get a clearer understanding of the possibility of >> sorting a search by entries that have the most number of matches >> first. > > > WebDNA automatically sorts by placing the records with the most > matches at the top of the founditems list. If you use sort parameters > you will override this automatic ranking of the entire founditems > list, but ranking will still occur within the groups you are sorting > by -- unless you put "&allhit=1" into your search parameters which > will effectively turn off all automatic ranking. > > -- > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less! > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Robert Wade

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

acrobat -> wc (1998) Pirated WebCat? NOT... (2003) [index] (1997) ExclusiveLock (2000) Windows 2.1b2 Append Bug? (1997) Hidden or Forbidden? (1998) Sorting (1998) PIXO support (1997) calculating tax rates, mail order solutions and version 2 (1997) listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) [/application] error? (1997) WebCat Error Log problem (2.0.1, acgi, Mac) (1997) this works sometimes and sometimes not (1997) Upload Plugin (1998) [WebDNA] WARNING Do not upgrade to OS X Server 5.04 (2015) Detecting the screen size (2003) Problem with [Search] inside of [Loop]? (1997) MacActivity and PCS (1997) WebCat hosting providers? (1997) Store Builder, technical infos (1998)