Re: Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 52140
interpreted = N
texte = I've just seen the end of this thread and have always wanted a [summnumfound] when searching and doing a summ=T Seems this would help a lot in this situation as well .. ? So [search db=mydb.db&neFIELDdata=find_all&FIELDsumm=T] [founditems] [field] : [sumnumfound] [/founditems] [/search] This would be quite easy to resort this data without a whole lot more nested searches .. Alain >> Glenn, thanks, but that won't work for my situation. It still doesn't put >> the highest number of results in order. The example you provided would sort >> the results of each group. I need a listing of summarized groups with the >> most per group listed first. (god, I'm confusing myself now). Besides, >> you're talking about nesting about 3,000 searches there. Yikes. >> > > If you can't find a code solution to solve your problem, you have a serious > problem with the data being used. > > Your options are > 1- Write code to sort the existing data as you want, even if it requires more > than one search > 2- Revise the db to include a field that contains data that will let you sort > as you want > 3- Write a new db that keeps metadata about the existing db that can be sorted > as you want. > > Pick one and go for it. > > Glenn > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I've just seen the end of this thread and have always wanted a [summnumfound] when searching and doing a summ=T Seems this would help a lot in this situation as well .. ? So [search db=mydb.db&neFIELDdata=find_all&FIELDsumm=T] [founditems] [field] : [sumnumfound] [/founditems] [/search] This would be quite easy to resort this data without a whole lot more nested searches .. Alain >> Glenn, thanks, but that won't work for my situation. It still doesn't put >> the highest number of results in order. The example you provided would sort >> the results of each group. I need a listing of summarized groups with the >> most per group listed first. (god, I'm confusing myself now). Besides, >> you're talking about nesting about 3,000 searches there. Yikes. >> > > If you can't find a code solution to solve your problem, you have a serious > problem with the data being used. > > Your options are > 1- Write code to sort the existing data as you want, even if it requires more > than one search > 2- Revise the db to include a field that contains data that will let you sort > as you want > 3- Write a new db that keeps metadata about the existing db that can be sorted > as you want. > > Pick one and go for it. > > Glenn > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Alain Russell
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Special characters in field names (1998)
Nesting FoundItem Context (1997)
[PROTECT] Problem (2003)
So when do we get something similar? (1998)
[OT] Position vacant in Sydney, Australia (2006)
Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997)
too many nested [xxx] (1997)
[WebDNA] How to stop cutting a word (2008)
[OT] (waaaay OT) (2004)
WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
Hey .. so when are you guys (2004)
RE: How much ram??? (1997)
Searching for the end (1998)
credit card services (1997)
[WebDNA] A good PDF reference for beginners (2011)
Where's Cart Created ? (1997)
[WebDNA] Hard-coded db write delay when running certain code? (2011)
Phonetic Search (2001)
Web Catalog not encrypting/decrypting problem (1998)