Re: Date question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53299
interpreted = N
texte = andy mowrey wrote: > I pulled the missing days thing from "man cal": > > "The Gregorian Reformation is assumed to have occurred in 1752 on > the 3rd > of September. By this time, most countries had recognized the > reforma- > tion (although a few did not recognize it until the early 1900's.) > Ten > days following that date were eliminated by the reformation, so the > cal- > endar for that month is a bit unusual." > That is a rather vast oversimplification. The actual papal bull switching from Julian to Gregorian Calendar was promulgated on 1582 February 24. So 1582 October 4 was followed by 1582 October 15 (10 days dropped). However, seeing that the Pope was Catholic, the Protestants hardly agreed immediately. Different countries around the globe made these adjustments at different dates over the next ~340 years after the "official" adjustment. This may be the best online resource: http://www.tondering.dk/claus/calendar.html and here's the page with the discussion of when various countries switched: http://www.tondering.dk/claus/cal/node3.html#SECTION00324000000000000000 However, unless you are storing and using date values prior to 1900, there is no reason to worry about whether it was 10, 11, or 13 days. HTH John p.s. the 2 Sept 1752 date was when British Empire and colonies switched -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Govinda 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Govinda 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Steve Craig 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Gil Poulsen 2008)
  5. [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Steve Craig 2008)
  6. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  7. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  8. Re: Silly date question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  9. Re: Silly date question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  10. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  11. Re: Silly date question ( Gary Krockover 2006)
  12. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  13. Silly date question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  14. Re: Date question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  15. Re: Date question ( John Peacock 2003)
  16. Re: Date question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  17. Re: Date question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  18. Re: Date question ( Alex McCombie 2003)
  19. Re: Date question ( andy mowrey 2003)
  20. Re: Date question ( John Hill 2003)
  21. Date question ( andy mowrey 2003)
  22. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  23. Re: Date Question (Gary Krockover 2002)
  24. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  25. Re: Date Question (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  26. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  27. Re: Date Question (Donovan 2002)
  28. Re: Date Question (Donovan 2002)
  29. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  30. Re: Date Question (Chris List Recipient 2002)
  31. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  32. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  33. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  34. Re: Date Question (Gary Krockover 2002)
  35. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  36. Re: Date Question (John Peacock 2002)
  37. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  38. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  39. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
andy mowrey wrote: > I pulled the missing days thing from "man cal": > > "The Gregorian Reformation is assumed to have occurred in 1752 on > the 3rd > of September. By this time, most countries had recognized the > reforma- > tion (although a few did not recognize it until the early 1900's.) > Ten > days following that date were eliminated by the reformation, so the > cal- > endar for that month is a bit unusual." > That is a rather vast oversimplification. The actual papal bull switching from Julian to Gregorian Calendar was promulgated on 1582 February 24. So 1582 October 4 was followed by 1582 October 15 (10 days dropped). However, seeing that the Pope was Catholic, the Protestants hardly agreed immediately. Different countries around the globe made these adjustments at different dates over the next ~340 years after the "official" adjustment. This may be the best online resource: http://www.tondering.dk/claus/calendar.html and here's the page with the discussion of when various countries switched: http://www.tondering.dk/claus/cal/node3.html#SECTION00324000000000000000 However, unless you are storing and using date values prior to 1900, there is no reason to worry about whether it was 10, 11, or 13 days. HTH John p.s. the 2 Sept 1752 date was when British Empire and colonies switched -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WCS Newbie question (1997) UnitShopCost (2007) Bug Report, maybe (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) Grep question [parsing variables] problem (2003) Re[3]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) customizing the color of user's pages (1997) Changing in a founditems tag (1999) Discounts (1998) Drop Down Menus (2002) NEW INFO: I'm stuck: Can't open order file. Ignoring[OrderFile] context (2000) [protect] on NT? (1997) Misc Stuff That Might Help (1997) webcat 3.06f on Linux keeps dying (1999) Still can't interpret encrypted templates. (2003) turning every 5th line red (1998) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) [OT] Forums - check it out (2005) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997)