Re: [founditems][replacefounditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53660
interpreted = N
texte = No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified fields in all found records to the same value. This is why replacefounditems was created. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 11:37 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Hmm, does [replace] work like that? > > Donovan > > > > Brian Fries wrote: > >> DB fields for the record being replaced ARE available within a >> [replacefounditems] context, so the nesting is unnecessary (and >> potentially dangerous - if multiple records are found). >> [search...] >> [replacefounditems]field=[dbfieldvalue],[formvalue]&...[/ >> replacefounditems] >> [/search] >> should work fine. >> - brian >> -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  3. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  8. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  9. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  10. [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified fields in all found records to the same value. This is why replacefounditems was created. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 11:37 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Hmm, does [replace] work like that? > > Donovan > > > > Brian Fries wrote: > >> DB fields for the record being replaced ARE available within a >> [replacefounditems] context, so the nesting is unnecessary (and >> potentially dangerous - if multiple records are found). >> [search...] >> [replacefounditems]field=[dbfieldvalue],[formvalue]&...[/ >> replacefounditems] >> [/search] >> should work fine. >> - brian >> -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

AppleScript does not work properly ... (2000) docs for WebCatalog2 (1997) Server IP address? (1998) Emailer kaput? (2000) Server Creation - vendors (2005) help needed: Non-english characters in WebCatalog (1997) webcatalog [date] bug...not (1999) can WC render sites out? (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) why .HTML pages no processing? (2000) webcatalog for linux (1998) WebCatalog not recognizing ShoppingCarts folder (2000) Download URL & access on the fly ? (1997) [WebDNA] SweepCartFrequency (2010) Smith Micro Site (2000) Signal Raised (1997) [WebDNA] Using WebDNA with MAMP (2010) Urgent help needed (1998) carriage returns in data (1997) PIXO (1997)