Re: [founditems][replacefounditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53664
interpreted = N
texte = For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  3. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  8. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  9. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  10. [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WCS Newbie question (1997) ShowNext Command (1997) [WebDNA] Carriage Return/Line Feed Issue (2009) removing programming logic white space (2003) RE: WebCat name recognition (was MacFinder -- a new WebDNAweb site) (1998) Developer Edition (2003) [quantity] - spoke too soon (1997) The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (2000) Format of Required fields error message (1997) Security (2002) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) Shipping charges depending on tax rate? (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) The Form authentication trick (2000) WebStar and CopyFile (2000) WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems (1997) triggers.db (1999) Need help with emailer- 2 issues (1997) [append] and SSL (1997) Tip: upgrading to WebCatalog 3.x, fields to watch for (1999)