Re: [founditems][replacefounditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53664
interpreted = N
texte = For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  3. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  8. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  9. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  10. [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997) Date or time comparisons have bugs ... (1998) Migrating to NT (1997) Resume Catalog ? (1997) [WebDNA] Server Time Offset - BUG (2016) problem with NT beta (1997) California Tax Rates (1998) OT-JS why it does not run on Mac (2001) too many nested ... problem (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) 4.01 broken pages using ShowNext (2000) validatin on NT (sorry for the dups and etc) (1998) WebCatalog 3.x (2003) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) redirect from the errorsMessages.db entry (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Date problems-more (1997) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) PCS Frames (1997) TIP: using [middle] to peel off page.html from [referrer] (2004)