Re: [founditems][replacefounditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53664
interpreted = N
texte = For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  3. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  8. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  9. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  10. [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

SSL/Document Contains NO Data (1998) Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997) Problems with dbcatalog.exe (1997) Sorting by date (1997) Quit revisited (1997) WebCat 3.0.7 Mac CGI & encryption (2001) [SearchString] problem with [search] context (1997) Looking for host (1999) Authenticate (1997) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Access file on a remote server (2003) [WebDNA] Permissions changing of .db (2013) Searching multiple fields from one form field (1997) Automated FTP from Shell - Update (2004) [WebDNA] [TCPSend] Test email address??? (2011) RE: [WebDNA] Libmysql.dll error (2009) URGENT! ACGI Stopped!!!! (1997) bounces (2008) Moment of Thanks (1997) Multiple Items (2004)