Re: [founditems][replacefounditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53664
interpreted = N
texte = For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  3. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  8. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  9. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  10. [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

New NT beta available (1997) mailto: tag (2001) Suddenly can't see files... (2000) Format question WC Mac f3 (1997) [Listfiles] vs Netfinder (1997) PERL to Web DNA (2000) [format xs] freeze (1997) NewCart+Search with one click ? (1997) High ASCII inside [LOOKUP] inside [LISTWORDS] (1998) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) Stinkin' [Referrer] (1998) Installing on IIS 5.1 Windows XP Pro - Username/Password (2006) [WebDNA] HTTP Streaming -- impossible? (2010) A little syntax help (1997) Still refusing connections ... (1999) 5.0 feature request: Sort for ListWords (2001) OT: Apache Question (2003) Separate SSL Server (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)