Re: [founditems][replacefounditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53664
interpreted = N
texte = For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  3. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  7. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  8. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  9. Re: [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Brian Fries 2003)
  10. [founditems][replacefounditems] ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
For one record? probably the first. For multiple records? probably the second. - brian On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > What is faster? > A lookup and a replace > > or a search and replacefounditems? > > Probably the first. > Donovan > > > > Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> Brian Fries wrote: >>> No, because replace is not a looping context. It sets the specified >>> fields in all found records to the same value. This is why >>> replacefounditems was created. >> Makes perfect sense... didn't think it through (since >> in this situation I have one found record to replace) >> Donovan -- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Mac: [ListFiles] bug alert (1997) Multiple matches in a search (2004) textA (1998) RAM variables (1997) Adding insurance (2003) Performance Issue (2000) Fwd: Problems with Webcatalog Plug-in (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) stuck time (1998) [WebDNA] Installed but can't configure (2016) [OT] WebDNA Family Album (2004) History of beta changes? (1999) Hiding a subsection of text (2002) two part electronic product (1998) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) searching by part of the date information (1999) Cannot calculate prices (1997) [shownext] and sort (1998) Rhapsody? (1997) no [search] with NT (1997)