Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature???

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53999
interpreted = N
texte = >Quick OT question for the list if you will. > >Lately, I've gotten flack on another list for the size >of my signature. My first reaction was to tell them to >get a life.. However, I did some looking around and find >that the list mentioned is probably not the only list that >feels that way. So, in this lists opinion, should I >consider shortening it or should I consider the people at >this list to break away from the borg and become real people >again? > >Off list is fine if you don't want to create clutter. > >Thanks, >Donovan > I fell it best to have a small signature or non at all when posting to the talk list. Jeff -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Mark Derrick 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( CN Stuff 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  7. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Rob Marquardt 2003)
  8. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  9. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  10. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Rob 2003)
  11. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  12. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  13. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Jeff Logan 2003)
  14. [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
>Quick OT question for the list if you will. > >Lately, I've gotten flack on another list for the size >of my signature. My first reaction was to tell them to >get a life.. However, I did some looking around and find >that the list mentioned is probably not the only list that >feels that way. So, in this lists opinion, should I >consider shortening it or should I consider the people at >this list to break away from the borg and become real people >again? > >Off list is fine if you don't want to create clutter. > >Thanks, >Donovan > I fell it best to have a small signature or non at all when posting to the Talk List. Jeff -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jeff Logan

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

setting taxable to true (1997) Date Formats (1997) Another bug to squash (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) Putting & into a database (1999) [sendmail] possible modification needed... (2000) How far do [showif]s go? (1997) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) Formating Tables w/[founditems] (1998) Nested vs conditional (1997) Cancel Subscription (1996) [WebDNA] Can't see were it's wrong.... (2017) Problem with Formulas.db (1998) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) question about checkboxes (1999) 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) New Command prefs ... (1997) First Attempts (2000) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) [] Boxes in Safari (2004)