Re: What about the fixes that were promised for 5.2 ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56202
interpreted = N
texte = >On Feb 17, 2004, at 3:49 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote: > >>Sorry Phil that sounds like a copout to me. >>If it isn't final you shouldn't talk as if it is. > >Agreed... That's where my frustration on the issue lies. SMSI's new policy seems to be "Lie now, pay later." They can post all the excuses they want, but when they tell us that a new feature will be included in a free release on their own mailing list, that is a public announcement as far as I'm concerned. At the very LEAST it is an announcement that is addressed to every list subscriber, which means they owe every list subscriber a free upgrade to whatever version has the new features they promised us. Am I right? Whether they call it v5.2 or v6 is irrelevant, we just want SMSI to provide what they promised. What good is a man (or a company) if his word cannot be trusted? -- Kenneth Grome WebDNA Programmer Outsource Service Provider Phone: +6332 255-6591 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What about the fixes that were promised for 5.2 ? ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  2. Re: What about the fixes that were promised for 5.2 ? ( Jesse Proudman 2004)
  3. Re: What about the fixes that were promised for 5.2 ? ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
  4. Re: What about the fixes that were promised for 5.2 ? ( "Phillip Bonesteele" 2004)
  5. What about the fixes that were promised for 5.2 ? ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
>On Feb 17, 2004, at 3:49 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote: > >>Sorry Phil that sounds like a copout to me. >>If it isn't final you shouldn't talk as if it is. > >Agreed... That's where my frustration on the issue lies. SMSI's new policy seems to be "Lie now, pay later." They can post all the excuses they want, but when they tell us that a new feature will be included in a free release on their own mailing list, that is a public announcement as far as I'm concerned. At the very LEAST it is an announcement that is addressed to every list subscriber, which means they owe every list subscriber a free upgrade to whatever version has the new features they promised us. Am I right? Whether they call it v5.2 or v6 is irrelevant, we just want SMSI to provide what they promised. What good is a man (or a company) if his word cannot be trusted? -- Kenneth Grome WebDNA Programmer Outsource Service Provider Phone: +6332 255-6591 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

MacAuthorize and WebMerchant (1997) Erotic Sites (1997) WebDNA on Windows questions (2007) Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997) [SameAsShipping] (2005) WC2b12: Yes, Formulas.db is for real (1997) [WebDNA] Moving to Sandbox broke price (2009) writing orders to a db (1997) Feature request: [decrypt seed=xxxxx] from [lookup] (2005) Me know logical no need (2002) Thanks for tips, more quest (1997) form data submission gets truncated (1997) Cold Fusion Buster (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) IE Cache Problems... (1999) Whats going on? (2000) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997)