Re: ColdFusion v. WebDNA

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 57515
interpreted = N
texte = Cold Fusion 6.1 MX is built on the Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) platform and outputs Java Byte Code. Basically each application is compiled at runtime which, for the most part would make it faster. The trade off is the amount of time it takes to code the application. Although it doesn't actually compile the application, it generates the Byte Code for the JVM to execute. This is actually called JIT or Just in Time Compiling. This is the same technique used in the Microsoft.Net platform that includes C#, C++, and VB which all compile to what they call the CLR or Common Language Runtime. Both J2EE and .NET run most of the processing at the server rather than the client. With the speed of the current servers, you are able to run rich client interfaces on the server that you could not run in the client browser. WebDNA is an Interpreted language which means that the Engine already has the compiled code and executes the results after receiving it and then decides what to display to the client. This is much faster and easier to code since you are replacing the actual C or C++ code with a [WEBDNA] tag. Another benefit of WebDNA would be the internal text database which also saves a lot of time and overhead. This is ideal for basic applications that Do not require a SQL server and when the speed of development is most important especially since the actual speed is probably not going to be noticed in a smaller application. I am by no means an expert in any of this, I just happen to be taking a class on Visual Studio .NET. Hope this helps, Sal D'Anna -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of Nitai @ ComputerOil Sent: 2004-04-26 7:09 AM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: ColdFusion v. WebDNA On 26/4/04 4:05 PM, "charles kline" wrote: > I have used both (and on fairly large projects). I have switched from > ColdFusion to PHP though for the most part on any non-WebSNA project - > and... it has been a few year on the ColdFusion stuff, but one of my > best buddies is a Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > - whatcha got? maybe we can help? Ok, why did you switch from CF to PHP? Then also, why should one choose WebDNA over CF, or in what is WebDNA better then Cf and so on...... Just some facts so I can give my customer for my presentation something to think about (and can defend WebDNA). Nitai -- Redakto - Content Management that simply works Content Management & eBusiness Systems ComputerOilR AG Dammstrasse 7 5400 Baden / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: ColdFusion v. WebDNA ( "Sal" 2004)
  2. Re: ColdFusion v. WebDNA ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2004)
  3. Re: ColdFusion v. WebDNA ( charles kline 2004)
  4. ColdFusion v. WebDNA ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2004)
  5. ColdFusion v. WebDNA ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2004)
Cold Fusion 6.1 MX is built on the Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) platform and outputs Java Byte Code. Basically each application is compiled at runtime which, for the most part would make it faster. The trade off is the amount of time it takes to code the application. Although it doesn't actually compile the application, it generates the Byte Code for the JVM to execute. This is actually called JIT or Just in Time Compiling. This is the same technique used in the Microsoft.Net platform that includes C#, C++, and VB which all compile to what they call the CLR or Common Language Runtime. Both J2EE and .NET run most of the processing at the server rather than the client. With the speed of the current servers, you are able to run rich client interfaces on the server that you could not run in the client browser. WebDNA is an Interpreted language which means that the Engine already has the compiled code and executes the results after receiving it and then decides what to display to the client. This is much faster and easier to code since you are replacing the actual C or C++ code with a [WEBDNA] tag. Another benefit of WebDNA would be the internal text database which also saves a lot of time and overhead. This is ideal for basic applications that Do not require a SQL server and when the speed of development is most important especially since the actual speed is probably not going to be noticed in a smaller application. I am by no means an expert in any of this, I just happen to be taking a class on Visual Studio .NET. Hope this helps, Sal D'Anna -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of Nitai @ ComputerOil Sent: 2004-04-26 7:09 AM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: ColdFusion v. WebDNA On 26/4/04 4:05 PM, "charles kline" wrote: > I have used both (and on fairly large projects). I have switched from > ColdFusion to PHP though for the most part on any non-WebSNA project - > and... it has been a few year on the ColdFusion stuff, but one of my > best buddies is a Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > - whatcha got? maybe we can help? Ok, why did you switch from CF to PHP? Then also, why should one choose WebDNA over CF, or in what is WebDNA better then Cf and so on...... Just some facts so I can give my customer for my presentation something to think about (and can defend WebDNA). Nitai -- Redakto - Content Management that simply works Content Management & eBusiness Systems ComputerOilR AG Dammstrasse 7 5400 Baden / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Sal"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

How To question on setting up downloads (1997) Show shoppingcart after remove last item (1997) list cookies and list http headers (1997) Search syntax question (1998) graphic to appear automatically... (2000) Roundup function? (1997) Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997) payflowpro problem (2003) bug in convertchars and char %0A (1998) creative use of webcatalog (1998) Sendmail Excel attachment (2003) WC 2.0 frames feature (1997) WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 New Features (1997) Single Link browsing (1997) SSL and reg web* (1997) [SearchString] usage (1997) Hyperboard/bulletin board available (1998) PIXO support (1997) Protect (1997) [carts] and databases (1997)