Re: webDNA language.

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 58830
interpreted = N
texte = Hi there, I am not one of the developers of WebDNA, but I can tell you for sure that they are working hard on fixing the XML syntax code at the moment. In the meantime, we can all continue with the "classic" syntax. I just wonder what "problems" are you talking about, which have caused "unexpected results"? Nitai Roberto A. Berrospe Machin wrote: >Hello every body. >I write just to let the list and the creators of webDNA some things. First, >i think this is a really Cool! scripting language, really easy to use, >understand, and so on... >But the bad thing is that the standart syntax and the xml syntax works >really unespectivelly.. you can use things in the standart syntax that you >cannot use in the xml syntax and viceversa. >As everybody know, i have finded some bugs thats appears when you use XML >syntax. In this case i have used webDNA v5.1. But recently i have downloaded >the v6 (developer edition) and, you know what? the same problems happens. >Also i finded other bugs with the deep of the if's in the xml syntax with >complex boolean expression, date and so on. > >So, i hope the developers of webDNA can solve all these issues... and i >think they need separate the standart syntax and the xml syntax in separated >products. This is not only good to make the price a litle small (from my >point is too expensive), this way the creators (developers of webDNA) can >debug better the source code of the webDNA interpreter and find out the bugs >more easy... I personally have experience (i have created some compilers) >with the creation of parsers and scanners and including the use of some >good generators like COCOR, and i know how complicated and unecesary is mix >two syntax. > >So, this is my (simple) opinion, and maybe is good to the creators to take >this opinnion in consideration :) > >But, anyway... cool language. > >Grettings to all. > >Roberto Antonio Berrospe Machin. > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > -- Redakto - Content Management that simply works Content Management & eBusiness Systems ComputerOil® AG Dammstrasse 7 5400 Baden / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: webDNA language. ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2004)
  2. webDNA language. ( "Roberto A. Berrospe Machin" 2004)
Hi there, I am not one of the developers of WebDNA, but I can tell you for sure that they are working hard on fixing the XML syntax code at the moment. In the meantime, we can all continue with the "classic" syntax. I just wonder what "problems" are you talking about, which have caused "unexpected results"? Nitai Roberto A. Berrospe Machin wrote: >Hello every body. >I write just to let the list and the creators of webDNA some things. First, >i think this is a really Cool! scripting language, really easy to use, >understand, and so on... >But the bad thing is that the standart syntax and the xml syntax works >really unespectivelly.. you can use things in the standart syntax that you >cannot use in the xml syntax and viceversa. >As everybody know, i have finded some bugs thats appears when you use XML >syntax. In this case i have used webDNA v5.1. But recently i have downloaded >the v6 (developer edition) and, you know what? the same problems happens. >Also i finded other bugs with the deep of the if's in the xml syntax with >complex boolean expression, date and so on. > >So, i hope the developers of webDNA can solve all these issues... and i >think they need separate the standart syntax and the xml syntax in separated >products. This is not only good to make the price a litle small (from my >point is too expensive), this way the creators (developers of webDNA) can >debug better the source code of the webDNA interpreter and find out the bugs >more easy... I personally have experience (i have created some compilers) >with the creation of parsers and scanners and including the use of some >good generators like COCOR, and i know how complicated and unecesary is mix >two syntax. > >So, this is my (simple) opinion, and maybe is good to the creators to take >this opinnion in consideration :) > >But, anyway... cool language. > >Grettings to all. > >Roberto Antonio Berrospe Machin. > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > -- Redakto - Content Management that simply works Content Management & eBusiness Systems ComputerOil® AG Dammstrasse 7 5400 Baden / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Nitai @ ComputerOil"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) autosensing lanague selection (1997) OT Weird Messenger Service message (2002) How To question on setting up downloads (1997) Server crash (1997) Nitro plugin? (1998) can you take a look (2003) Emailer (1997) RAM variables (1997) [object] Tag & WebDNA Support (2005) Error .. (2003) OH MY GOD! (1998) Q: old cart serial problem (2000) More on the email templates (1997) [OT] .php3 extension (2000) Wrapping text (1998) changing creator codes (2000) Harvesting invalid email addresses from bounced emails??? (2000) Signal Raised error (1997) Snake Bites (1997)