Re: Google Web Accelerator

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2005


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 62016
interpreted = N
texte = Great, after going to great lengths to eliminate variable strings in links for search engine optimization ... from http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1813761,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 : "Web Accelerator ignores links where a question mark appears before the URL string in the HTML code. A question mark is usually included in a string to indicate personally identifiable information such as a user ID and would typically be used in a link that performs a function like a deletion, Mayer said." "The product is in beta," Mayer said. "It could be that our assumption around the question mark and the way sites comply with the standard is incorrect. If that is the case, then we'll have to redesign the prefetch algorithm." Fried acknowledged that the applications do not conform to all standards. For example, functions such as a deletion technically should be handled with buttons rather than links, he said. Google needs to recognize, however, that many sites use methods that vary from standards, he said. "To me, the real test here is not so much that Google may have made mistake but how they respond to it," Fried said. "Are they going to call it a mistake or blame everyone else to [make them] build products the way they should be built in a perfect world?" -- -- Terry Wilson | terry@terryfic.com | http://terryfic.com creator of: http://WhosComing.com - a simplified, affordable online reservation system http://WhosBringingWhat.com - online potluck signup sheet -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( rupert ravens 2005)
  2. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  3. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( Joe D'Andrea 2005)
  4. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( Terry Wilson 2005)
  5. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( "Dale's eLists" 2005)
  6. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( Terry Wilson 2005)
  7. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2005)
  8. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( "Dan Strong" 2005)
  9. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  10. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( sal danna 2005)
  11. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  12. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  13. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  14. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( Jay Van Vark 2005)
  15. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  16. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( John Peacock 2005)
  17. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( sal danna 2005)
  18. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( Donovan Brooke 2005)
  19. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( William DeVaul 2005)
  20. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( sal danna 2005)
  21. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( Donovan Brooke 2005)
  22. Re: Google Web Accelerator ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  23. Google Web Accelerator ( Terry Wilson 2005)
Great, after going to great lengths to eliminate variable strings in links for search engine optimization ... from http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1813761,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 : "Web Accelerator ignores links where a question mark appears before the URL string in the HTML code. A question mark is usually included in a string to indicate personally identifiable information such as a user ID and would typically be used in a link that performs a function like a deletion, Mayer said." "The product is in beta," Mayer said. "It could be that our assumption around the question mark and the way sites comply with the standard is incorrect. If that is the case, then we'll have to redesign the prefetch algorithm." Fried acknowledged that the applications do not conform to all standards. For example, functions such as a deletion technically should be handled with buttons rather than links, he said. Google needs to recognize, however, that many sites use methods that vary from standards, he said. "To me, the real test here is not so much that Google may have made mistake but how they respond to it," Fried said. "Are they going to call it a mistake or blame everyone else to [make them] build products the way they should be built in a perfect world?" -- -- Terry Wilson | terry@terryfic.com | http://terryfic.com creator of: http://WhosComing.com - a simplified, affordable online reservation system http://WhosBringingWhat.com - online potluck signup sheet -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Terry Wilson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997) Text data with spaces in them... (1997) Shipping charge question (2003) A few questions. . . (1997) [WebDNA] Dynamic vertical columns (2008) UnitShipCost, Formulas.db and passwords (2003) hidden databases (2000) [WebDNA] how to clear the [username] and [password] values the browser has stored? (2008) Problem with ShoppingCart.tpl refresh (2000) groupSearch help needed (2002) Separate SSL Server (1997) Locking up with WebCatalog... (1997) 2.1b3 --> way slow (1997) [WebDNA] Grep out square brackets? (2010) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Images generated by a web dna database (2003) format_to_days on NT (1997) Re:quit command on NT (1997) [isfile] ? (1997) Bad cookie (1998)