Re: Sorting... stumped.
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2006
numero = 63785
interpreted = N
texte = Woohoo! [listwords] solution worked and I learned that I could have multiple [founditems] sets within a [search] context. Amazing even after 5+ years of this stuff that I'm still learning things... Thanks a million. -Dan On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:06:07 -0500 Alex McCombie
wrote: > Well it certainly doesn't come up often but I am pretty sure you can have > multiple founditems inside a search... At least I was pretty certain. Well, > I used to think so ;-) > > No really, I would try it with just the founditems inside the listwords > and for some reason if that doesn't work then you can do the 3 searches > which shouldn't be really that bad because you will have a much more narrow > search criteria. > > So if the multiple FI doesn't work (and please try it) then just try this > instead (which I am certain will work) > > Listwords value > search SOMEFIELDdatarq=wordvalue > founditems > data > /founditems > /search > /listwords > > This will definitely work but I cant help but believe that multiple FI is > allowed. > > Sorry for leaving you hanging there... Caught me at dinner ;-) > > Alex > > > >>> Set the initial pulldown bars with your 3 values: >>> >>> T >>> Q >>> N >>> >>> >>> Then on the results page use the field value inside a listwords context to >>> manipulate the 3 founditem sets. >>> >>> >>> Listwords value >>> founditems >>> showif if value of data = word value >>> /founditems >>> /listwords >>> >>> This will essentially do the one search but show the proper records through >>> 3 founditem instances in the order you want. >>> >>> Make sense? >> >> Maybe. Are you saying that I can do multiple [founditems] inside of a single >> search context? No, >> you can't be, that's not possible (right)? Do you mean nesting 3 searches, but >> changing the order >> of them as required by whichever option (T/Q/N)? >> >> Sorry if what you're saying is simple and I'm overcomplicating it, but I'm not >> totally following >> you yet... oh and thanks for the help. >> -Dan > -- > Alex J McCombie ~ Alex@Adventureskies.com p:315~233~9403 > Adventure Skies Interactive (ASI) > "You can find it all under Adventure Skies" > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:[listwords] solution worked and I learned that I could have multiple [founditems] sets within a [search] context. Amazing even after 5+ years of this stuff that I'm still learning things... Thanks a million. -Dan On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:06:07 -0500 Alex McCombie wrote: > Well it certainly doesn't come up often but I am pretty sure you can have > multiple founditems inside a search... At least I was pretty certain. Well, > I used to think so ;-) > > No really, I would try it with just the founditems inside the listwords > and for some reason if that doesn't work then you can do the 3 searches > which shouldn't be really that bad because you will have a much more narrow > search criteria. > > So if the multiple FI doesn't work (and please try it) then just try this > instead (which I am certain will work) > > Listwords value > search SOMEFIELDdatarq=wordvalue > founditems > data > /founditems > /search > /listwords > > This will definitely work but I cant help but believe that multiple FI is > allowed. > > Sorry for leaving you hanging there... Caught me at dinner ;-) > > Alex > > > >>> Set the initial pulldown bars with your 3 values: >>> >>> T >>> Q >>> N >>> >>> >>> Then on the results page use the field value inside a listwords context to >>> manipulate the 3 founditem sets. >>> >>> >>> Listwords value >>> founditems >>> showif if value of data = word value >>> /founditems >>> /listwords >>> >>> This will essentially do the one search but show the proper records through >>> 3 founditem instances in the order you want. >>> >>> Make sense? >> >> Maybe. Are you saying that I can do multiple [founditems] inside of a single >> search context? No, >> you can't be, that's not possible (right)? Do you mean nesting 3 searches, but >> changing the order >> of them as required by whichever option (T/Q/N)? >> >> Sorry if what you're saying is simple and I'm overcomplicating it, but I'm not >> totally following >> you yet... oh and thanks for the help. >> -Dan > -- > Alex J McCombie ~ Alex@Adventureskies.com p:315~233~9403 > Adventure Skies Interactive (ASI) > "You can find it all under Adventure Skies" > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
"Dan Strong"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
cart limit (2002) Credit card processing - UK (1997) Trouble with [fileinfo] (2004) Sense/Disallow HTML tags during $Append (1997) PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Logging purchases (1997) I read the manual (2000) PCS Frames (1997) Help formatting search results w/ table (1997) WebTen and WebCat (1997) emailer (1997) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) Field name-subcategory (1997) Generating unique SKU from [cart] (1997) SET and C-SET (1998) webcat feature request (1997) converted seed value? (1998) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) simple search Q (2000)