ColdFusion
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2006
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 67754
interpreted = N
texte = As a official Adobe Partner we can say that ColdFusion runs on MacOS Xquite good. As ColdFusion is based on Java you can run the installerthat will produce a java class for you which you can then install intoTomcat or any other J2EE server again. I even got it running on a OracleApplication Server.I don't want to argue about WebDNA or ColdFusion and which one isbetter, but architecture wise ColdFusion has many advantages since it isbased on Java. Actually quite clever since they don't have to worryabout database driver and underlying platform.Nitai-- eBusines Suites simplified.eContentPark - Enterprise Digital Asset Management free of chargeeServices - The complete SupportSuiteeSurvey - Online Questionnaire made easyRedakto CMS - Content Management that simply worksComputerOil® AGNeugutstrasse 668600 Dübendorf / SwitzerlandTelefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66info@computeroil.comhttp://computeroil.comhttp://econtentpark.comDonovan Brooke wrote:> Brian B. Burton wrote:>> FWIW - there is a saying "no answer is an answer". Oh, sure sure, >> SMSI needs to keep some info quiet. But there is a different risk, >> that is the risk of customers jumping ship because of a perceived >> lack of product development. They say it costs 10-50x* to acquire a >> new customer as to keep one.>>>> That being said, As much as I love WebDNA, it looks like both WebDNA >> and WebSTAR have become EOL. Therefor I am slowly switching over to >> ColdFusion and RoR. Coldfusion is 80% webdna (seriously, go take a >> look, you already know this language) and RoR just looks so damn >> efficient (from a coding side, I bet it's super huge computationally >> expensive.)>>>> The plus side for the alternatives, I get to get out for the website >> hosting business, woot! Let someone else worry about hackers, and >> server uptime. Have you seen how cheap hosting is these days?>>>> Anyway, that's my two cents. Every day that Kerio and SMSI don't >> talk, is another day closer to the transition.>>>>>> Brian B. Burton> [snip]>>> It appears ColdFusion is in the same boat as WebDNA. It appears> to work with tiger.. but appears to run on only PowerPC chips at the> moment... (which I didn't even realize Adobe had ported to OSX)> Are plans in the works for the intel macs?>> Donovan>>>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
As a official Adobe Partner we can say that ColdFusion runs on MacOS Xquite good. As ColdFusion is based on Java you can run the installerthat will produce a java class for you which you can then install intoTomcat or any other J2EE server again. I even got it running on a OracleApplication Server.I don't want to argue about WebDNA or ColdFusion and which one isbetter, but architecture wise ColdFusion has many advantages since it isbased on Java. Actually quite clever since they don't have to worryabout database driver and underlying platform.Nitai-- eBusines Suites simplified.eContentPark - Enterprise Digital Asset Management free of chargeeServices - The complete SupportSuiteeSurvey - Online Questionnaire made easyRedakto CMS - Content Management that simply worksComputerOil® AGNeugutstrasse 668600 Dübendorf / SwitzerlandTelefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66info@computeroil.comhttp://computeroil.comhttp://econtentpark.comDonovan Brooke wrote:> Brian B. Burton wrote:>> FWIW - there is a saying "no answer is an answer". Oh, sure sure, >> SMSI needs to keep some info quiet. But there is a different risk, >> that is the risk of customers jumping ship because of a perceived >> lack of product development. They say it costs 10-50x* to acquire a >> new customer as to keep one.>>>> That being said, As much as I love WebDNA, it looks like both WebDNA >> and WebSTAR have become EOL. Therefor I am slowly switching over to >> ColdFusion and RoR. Coldfusion is 80% webdna (seriously, go take a >> look, you already know this language) and RoR just looks so damn >> efficient (from a coding side, I bet it's super huge computationally >> expensive.)>>>> The plus side for the alternatives, I get to get out for the website >> hosting business, woot! Let someone else worry about hackers, and >> server uptime. Have you seen how cheap hosting is these days?>>>> Anyway, that's my two cents. Every day that Kerio and SMSI don't >> talk, is another day closer to the transition.>>>>>> Brian B. Burton> [snip]>>> It appears ColdFusion is in the same boat as WebDNA. It appears> to work with tiger.. but appears to run on only PowerPC chips at the> moment... (which I didn't even realize Adobe had ported to OSX)> Are plans in the works for the intel macs?>> Donovan>>>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
"Nitai @ ComputerOil"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Show new (2003)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
WebDNA 6 (2004)
[TCPConnect] questions/problems (2001)
Help name our technology! (1997)
Problems reading files created by WC (1997)
total number of matches (1999)
Just a thought (1998)
Webmerchant PC auth (1998)
WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)
multi-paragraph fields (1997)
Header info in content (1998)
Next X hits (1996)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
RE: Problems with shopping cart (1997)
Explorer 3.0/ Access Denied! (1997)
webcat license???? (1997)
emailer on Windows Beta 18 (1997)
test mail (2004)
RE: Ongoing group search problems ... (1997)