WebDNA's portability

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 68622
interpreted = N
texte = When people recently raised their hands as 'present', some stated why they stick with WebDNA, citing ease of use, etc. I agree. BUT! Soon as I get the time, I will learn php. The big reason is this email I just got tonight from a client for whom I am developing a site. Soon it will be time to go live on the site and shut down her static site hosted elsewhere:>>Hi Terry,>>What will be the advantage for me to switch to the Seattle site? I'm not>>challenging, just want to make a sound decision - fatcow costs $99/year.>>Perhaps we can discuss on Thursday? Thank you for your help! D.Yep, I understand her confusion. It would be great to be able to not rock the hosting boat and make her new site in php. Or be able to do a single section of someone's site without having to take the whole thing into a new hosting environment. Or to be able to get rid of a client and have them find another php person. Yeah, WebDNA is great to work with, but in today's environment it's something of an albatross.Terry-- Terry Wilson | terry@terryfic.com | http://terryfic.comhttp://WhosComing.com - a simplified, affordable online reservation systemhttp://TightJacket.com -- stylish protection for your laptop--------------------------------------------------------------------------Attitude is the only difference between ordeal and adventure.-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: WebDNA's portability ( "Brian B. Burton" 2007)
Re: WebDNA's portability ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2007)
Re: WebDNA's portability ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
Re: WebDNA's portability ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
Re: WebDNA's portability ( Matthew A Perosi 2007)
WebDNA's portability ( Terry Wilson 2007)

When people recently raised their hands as 'present', some stated why they stick with WebDNA, citing ease of use, etc. I agree. BUT! Soon as I get the time, I will learn php. The big reason is this email I just got tonight from a client for whom I am developing a site. Soon it will be time to go live on the site and shut down her static site hosted elsewhere:>>Hi Terry,>>What will be the advantage for me to switch to the Seattle site? I'm not>>challenging, just want to make a sound decision - fatcow costs $99/year.>>Perhaps we can discuss on Thursday? Thank you for your help! D.Yep, I understand her confusion. It would be great to be able to not rock the hosting boat and make her new site in php. Or be able to do a single section of someone's site without having to take the whole thing into a new hosting environment. Or to be able to get rid of a client and have them find another php person. Yeah, WebDNA is great to work with, but in today's environment it's something of an albatross.Terry-- Terry Wilson | terry@terryfic.com | http://terryfic.comhttp://WhosComing.com - a simplified, affordable online reservation systemhttp://TightJacket.com -- stylish protection for your laptop--------------------------------------------------------------------------Attitude is the only difference between ordeal and adventure.-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Terry Wilson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

WebDNA's portability

2007

Top Articles:

Related Readings: