Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64"
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101296
interpreted = N
texte = Brian Fries wrote:> Encrypted cookies do work, but it takes two url's going in, and none > coming back out.> > To set the cookie:> [setcookie domain=yourdomain.com&name=crypt&value=[url][url][encrypt > seed=12345678]bob the builder[/encrypt][/url][/url]]> > To retrieve the cookie:> [decrypt seed=12345678][getcookie name=crypt][/decrypt]> > This has been tested on multiple server platforms, including WebDNA > 5.1c and 6.0.1 on Mac, and 6.0a on Red Hat.> > Brian Fries> BrainScan SoftwareBrian,I took a few minutes to try your code out. so far, my tests onwindows and linux show that this conevention works every time...so, now we have a third encrypt/decrypt convention it appears. ;-)The question is, do we simply document well all these conventions,or do we try to unify the conventions? We'll definately look at thiswhen we get to that phase.You guys make our job easier! (well, most of you! ;-) )Donovan-- Donovan D. Brooke PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024----------------------------------------------VPWebDNA Software Corporation16192 Coastal HighwayLewes, DE 19958
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Brian Fries wrote:> Encrypted cookies do work, but it takes two url's going in, and none > coming back out.> > To set the cookie:> [setcookie domain=yourdomain.com&name=crypt&value=
[url][url][encrypt > seed=12345678]bob the builder[/encrypt][/url][/url]]> > To retrieve the cookie:> [decrypt seed=12345678][getcookie name=crypt][/decrypt]> > This has been tested on multiple server platforms, including WebDNA > 5.1c and 6.0.1 on Mac, and 6.0a on Red Hat.> > Brian Fries> BrainScan SoftwareBrian,I took a few minutes to try your code out. so far, my tests onwindows and linux show that this conevention works every time...so, now we have a third encrypt/decrypt convention it appears. ;-)The question is, do we simply document well all these conventions,or do we try to unify the conventions? We'll definately look at thiswhen we get to that phase.You guys make our job easier! (well, most of you! ;-) )Donovan-- Donovan D. Brooke PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024----------------------------------------------VPWebDNA Software Corporation16192 Coastal HighwayLewes, DE 19958
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Search Trouble (2002)
Apple event reply error (-1) (1997)
Templates on Unix & CGI on Mac? (1997)
autosensing lanague selection (1997)
Purchae error - Fixed to a degree (1997)
[if][/if] weirdness (2000)
question: back button prevention (1997)
Limiting user access to .tmpl files (1997)
help! problem using [referrer] still in 2.01 (1997)
Exclamation point (1997)
[protect] on NT? (1997)
oops private message leaked into talk list (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
[HIDEIF] inside [FOUNDITEM] (1997)
[WebDNA] proxy server domains mysteriously appear in webdna's domain list (2010)
page chokes on hideif when false and ignored (1998)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
Version 2.0 and 1.6 simultaneous (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
Ooops..Broswer Info.txt (was Web*SSL and WebCatalog) (1997)